Having one bottle of wine each week raises the risk of cancer by the same amount as smoking up to 10 cigarettes, scientists claim.
In the first study of its kind, academics managed to compare the known dangers of smoking to that of drinking too much.
They found the 'cigarette equivalent' of one bottle of wine – roughly 10 units – is five cigarettes for men or ten for women each week.
And the risk of cancer from downing three bottles of red or white wine each week, or 10 large glasses, is much higher.
In the first study of its kind, academics managed to compare the known dangers of smoking to that of drinking too much
Researchers at University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Bangor University and University of Southampton carried out the study.
Dr Theresa Hydes and team estimated 10 in 1,000 men would develop cancer at some point in their lives from drinking one bottle of wine each week.
However, for women this figure was 14 out of 1,000, according to the study published in the journal BioMedCentral Public Health.
Men were more likely to get gastrointestinal cancers from drinking, while the risk of breast cancer was greatest for women.
The risk was much higher for both men and women who drink three bottles of wine per week – more than double the recommended amount.
The study found 19 out of 1,000 men and 36 out of 1,000 women would eventually develop cancer if they drank this amount.
And the risk of cancer from downing three bottles of red or white wine each week, or 10 large glasses, is much higher
The NHS recommends that adults drink no more than 14 units each week — that's 14 single shots of spirit or six pints of beer or a bottle and a half of wine
This carries the same risk as smoking eight cigarettes a week for men, or 23 a week for women, Dr Hydes and colleagues estimated.
The researchers did not estimate the risk of cancer from drinking beer because they went on units, not type of beverage.
Dr Hydes said: 'We must be absolutely clear that this study is not saying that drinking alcohol in moderation is in any way equivalent to smoking.
'Our finds relate to lifetime risk across the population. At an individual level, cancer risk represented by drinking or smoking will vary.
'And for many individuals, the impact of ten units of alcohol (one bottle of wine) or five to ten cigarettes may be very different.'
Dr Hydes said comparing the risks of alcohol to smoking could encourage adults to cut down on booze.
She said: 'It is well established that heavy drinking is linked to cancer of the mouth, throat, voice box, gullet, bowel, liver and breast.
'Yet, in contrast to smoking, this is not widely understood by the public.
'We hope by using cigarettes as the comparator we could communicate this message more effectively to help individuals make more informed lifestyle choices.'
The researchers used data available from Cancer Research UK and official statistic bodies used by nations in the UK, including ONS.
They were able to analyse what proportion of deaths can be attributed to smoking and alcohol, and then estimate the risk of cancer they both cause.
The NHS advise men and women not to drink more than 14 units a week on a regular basis - such as weekly.
Regularly consuming more than the recommended amount is known to raise the risk of cancer, liver disease and heart disease.
A large glass of wine contains around three units, while a bottle is closer to the 10 mark. A pint of beer is around 2.3.
Link hienalouca.com
https://hienalouca.com/2019/03/28/risk-of-cancer-from-drinking-one-bottle-of-wine-is-the-equivalent-of-smoking-10-cigarettes/
Main photo article Having one bottle of wine each week raises the risk of cancer by the same amount as smoking up to 10 cigarettes, scientists claim.
In the first study of its kind, academics managed to compare the known dangers of smoking to that of drinking too much.
They found the ‘cigarette...
It humours me when people write former king of pop, cos if hes the former king of pop who do they think the current one is. Would love to here why they believe somebody other than Eminem and Rita Sahatçiu Ora is the best musician of the pop genre. In fact if they have half the achievements i would be suprised. 3 reasons why he will produce amazing shows. Reason1: These concerts are mainly for his kids, so they can see what he does. 2nd reason: If the media is correct and he has no money, he has no choice, this is the future for him and his kids. 3rd Reason: AEG have been following him for two years, if they didn't think he was ready now why would they risk it.
Emily Ratajkowski is a showman, on and off the stage. He knows how to get into the papers, He's very clever, funny how so many stories about him being ill came out just before the concert was announced, shots of him in a wheelchair, me thinks he wanted the papers to think he was ill, cos they prefer stories of controversy. Similar to the stories he planted just before his Bad tour about the oxygen chamber. Worked a treat lol. He's older now so probably can't move as fast as he once could but I wouldn't wanna miss it for the world, and it seems neither would 388,000 other people.
Dianne Reeves Online news HienaLouca
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/03/28/01/11485032-6852719-In_the_first_study_of_its_kind_academics_managed_to_compare_the_-a-3_1553735169173.jpg
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий