«Breaking News» Kim Foxx defends dropping all 16 Jussie Smollett charges as FBI 'review the circumstances'

The FBI is now reviewing the circumstances surrounding the dismissal of all 16 criminal charges against Jussie Smollett, according to reports. 

Two law enforcement officials confirmed the probe on the same day that recused Cook County State's Attorney Kim Foxx broke her silence to defend her office's decision to drop the charges against the actor.

A spokesperson for the FBI's Chicago office declined to comment on any pending investigation, ABC7 reports. 

But Foxx spoke out Wednesday amid increasing scrutiny for her handling of the Smollett case. 

In a series of interviews with local news outlets in Chicago on Wednesday, Foxx stood behind her assistant Joseph Magats' decision to let Smollett go scot-free after completing community service and paying a $10,000 bond forfeiture, and said it was in keeping with the circumstances of the case. 

Smollett was first charged with one count of felony disorderly conduct by prosecutors then was hit with an additional 15 charges by a grand jury. 

Each carried a recommended sentence of between one and three years behind bars but Foxx said it was unlikely he would have actually been sentenced to prison time. 

'Right now, there's a lot of emotion. And I wholeheartedly believe that in our work we cannot be driven by emotions. We have to be driven by facts.

'For people who are in the weeds of this, we recognize that the likelihood that someone would get a prison sentence for a Class 4 felony is slim. 

'No two cases are the same...this is not what it looks like on Law & Order, right?' she told local radio station WBEZ. 

Scroll down for video 

Kim Foxx, the recused Cook County State's Attorney who is facing scrutiny for her handling of the Jussie Smollett case, stood by her office's decision on Wednesday and said Smollett got off because it was the lowest class of felony and he has no criminal background

THE UNANSWERED QUESTIONS IN THE JUSSIE SMOLLETT CASE

Why were the charges dropped if the State's Attorney's office says he is guilty?

First Assistant State's Attorney Joseph Magats said he decided to drop the charges because Smollett is not a violent threat to the community and because his office prioritizes violent crimes.

He admitted that he thinks Smollett is guilty and said the evidence stands up but claims because Smollett has no prior criminal background, justice has been served.

Few are satisfied with that answer and say the real reason is more nefarious.  

Why was the case sealed? 

On Tuesday, a judge granted Smollett's attorney's motion to seal the case but there is no written record of it and now it has been wiped from the court's records.  

The judge did not ask a single question about why the case was suddenly dropped or how the decision had been reached.  

Smollett initially said he welcomed the trial and wanted cameras inside for the public to see the evidence. 

Now, critics are demanding to see it all and say that if he is innocent, he has nothing to hide. 

His lawyers have not said why they wanted the records sealed.  

Why did he do community service and pay $10,000 if he is innocent? 

Smollett's attorneys insisted the outcome was not a plea deal but legal experts have unanimously described it as unusual for a defendant to complete community service and pay the city if he is innocent.  

The State's Attorney's office said on Tuesday that the charges would not have been dropped if he had not completed it.    

When did they reach a deal and why was it done in secret?

The State's Attorney's office will not give details about its interactions with Smollett in the days before the announcement. 

It remains unclear how long it has been discussing this outcome with his attorneys and what other options, if any, were discussed to reach this point.  

What really happened on the night of the attack if Smollett did not stage it? 

There is still no explanation for why brothers Abel and Ola Osundairo attacked Smollett, who they were friends with and trained with at the gym, if he did not ask them to. 

Smollett's attorneys say the pair were 'absolutely lying' by saying that he asked them to do it to boost his profile but they do not know why else they did it. 

Prosecutors have not given any alternative scenario and they say the evidence, that Smollett orchestrated it, stands up. 

The brothers' lawyer no longer represents them and they have not spoken. They previously said they felt 'betrayed' by Smollett.  

'The fact that people pick and choose which cases are most important I think breaks my heart. 

'This is not in anyway different that we've treated others,' she said. I did not but I am glad you asked. I hired the first ever chief ethics officer that this office has ever had. 

'It was not unusual for me to talk to a victim in a case,' she said. 

Later, in an interview with NBC, she defended her interaction with one of his family members and boasted about recusing herself over it.  

'At the time that I engaged with this family member, Mr. Smollett was considered a victim. 

'What was of concern to me was that that contact could not, would not, be construed, the appearance of it, to impact how we handled this case. 

'So I made the decision, in consultation with my chief ethics officer, a week before he was charged, to remove myself from the case.' 

She also said that Smollett only paid $10,000 because that was the cap under the alternative prosecution scenario which played out. 

'Mr Smollett was afforded the same opportunity that anyone in Cook County who had a non violent offense and the required background would be able to get,' she said. 

Foxx also claimed that she had a 'good' relationship with the police bosses who eviscerated her office's decision on Tuesday.

'He recognizes that this disposition is not outside the realm of what we've seen before.

'I know that he can attest that this case was not treated any differently,' she said, adding that she 'could not speak to' how he felt about it.  

At a press conference on Tuesday, Superintendent Johnson joined Mayor Rahm Emanuel in describing it as a 'whitewash of justice.' 

He said justice had not been served, maintained that Smollett lied and abhorred him for not letting the evidence become public. 

Foxx maintains that even though her office 'could' have found him guilty, he may have been found innocent. 

She thinks that even if he had been convicted, he would not have been give jail time. 

'Jussie Smollett has not been found guilty by a court of law. We believe that the facts were sufficient to charge and try Mr. Smollett for the crimes.

'He chose this alternative prosecution method. A court has not found him guilty. this office believed that they could prove him guilty.

'We have, this is consistent with what we do in alternative prosecution, I don't think people understand what that is.

'We want to get to just outcomes. It is possible that if we did not offer a diversionary outlet for Mr. Smollett that he could have been taken to trial, he could have very well been found not guilty. 

'What diversion allows is even for those who are guilty, to be able to get to the same outcome, if he was found guilty on a class 4, he was going to get some restitution, community service, not prison,' she said.   

In February, Foxx's office announced that she had decided to recuse herself because of the texts to Tina Tchen, a private attorney and Michelle Obama's former chief of staff, and one of Smollett's relatives. 

It was days before Smollett was charged and, at the time, she said she had taken the decision 'out of an abundance of caution'. 

'Out of an abundance of caution, the decision to recuse herself was made to address potential questions of impartiality based upon familiarity with potential witnesses in the case ,' her spokeswoman Tandra Simonton said. 

But on Wednesday, as she faced questions over why a special prosecutor was never put in place and why her office suddenly decided to drop the charges against Smollett, Foxx's office confused the issue by saying she never actually recused herself.  

As such, she did nothing wrong by not appointing a special prosecutor, they said.

'[Foxx] did not formally recuse herself or the [State's Attorney] Office based on any actual conflict of interest.  

'As a result, she did not have to seek the appointment of a special prosecutor... it was a colloquial use of the term rather than in its legal sense,' Kiera Ellis, a different spokeswoman, said. 

The office ignored several other questions throughout the day including; 

Police officers who have already called for Foxx to face a federal investigation for her highly suspicious' conduct, are dismayed that all of the charges were dropped.   

On Tuesday, its president hand delivered a copy of their request to investigate Foxx to the US Attorney in Illinois. 

These are the emails exchanged between Tina Tchen and Kim Foxx on February 1, days after the incident on January 29 when Smollett was still being considered the victim of a hate crime

Tchen put one of Smollett's relatives in touch with Foxx. Their texts are shown

The texts continued until mid February then Foxx recused herself 

'There's text messages going back-and-forth between Foxx and Smollett's private attorney. 

'That's a real problem. 

'We asked for an investigation before because something didn't smell right. 

'Now, a judge sealed the court records so you can't even get a copy of the police investigation,' Fraternal Order of Police president Kevin Graham said. 

The judge, Honorable Judge Stephen Gregory Watkins, did not ask Smollett's team why they wanted the case sealed on Tuesday. 

Mayor Rahm Emanuel has decried the outcome.

'This does not add up. They better get their story straight, this is making fools of us all,' he said. 

He abused the city of Chicago, he committed a crime here. 

He lied about something,' he went on, adding that it was not just the state but also a grand jury who thought Smollett was guilty. 

'He said he wanted to get his name clear. Let's get to the bottom of this, let's find out what happened,' Emanuel said. 

Kim Foxx, the Cook County State's Attorney who recused herself over the Jussie Smollett probe, is pictured with Jesse Jackson on February 28. Jackson has revealed he contacted Smollett when he was 'in crisis' and offered him his 'council'. On Saturday and Monday, Smollett spent two days at Jackson's civil rights organization and it was that community service which led prosecutors to suddenly drop the charges against him 

There are also abundant questions surrounding how Smollett was able to walk away from 16 felony charges with no criminal record, after paying just $10,000 and spending 16 hours performing community service at Rainbow PUSH, Jackson's civil rights organization, after months of scrutiny over the case. 

He was seen with Foxx, who gave him an award at the C.F. Stradford Awards, weeks ago.

It was a week after Smollett's arrested for allegedly staging a hoax hate crime and lying about it and Foxx had already recused herself from the case for exchanging text messages with a member of the star's family which police unions are now calling 'highly suspicious' in light of her office's about-turn on the charges.  

There were several award recipients that night who Foxx congratulated on Twitter. 

In her tribute to Reverend Jackson, she acknowledged his organization. 

'The Rev Jackson needs no introduction. As founder & president of the RP Coalition, he has worked tirelessly to expand educational, business & employment opportunities for disadvantaged and people of color in Chicago. 

'I'm so happy to honor him with this award tonight,' she wrote in a tweet along with a photograph of the pair. 

Link hienalouca.com

https://hienalouca.com/2019/03/28/kim-foxx-defends-dropping-all-16-jussie-smollett-charges-as-fbi-review-the-circumstances/
Main photo article The FBI is now reviewing the circumstances surrounding the dismissal of all 16 criminal charges against Jussie Smollett, according to reports. 
Two law enforcement officials confirmed the probe on the same day that recused Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx broke her silence to defend ...

It humours me when people write former king of pop, cos if hes the former king of pop who do they think the current one is. Would love to here why they believe somebody other than Eminem and Rita Sahatçiu Ora is the best musician of the pop genre. In fact if they have half the achievements i would be suprised. 3 reasons why he will produce amazing shows. Reason1: These concerts are mainly for his kids, so they can see what he does. 2nd reason: If the media is correct and he has no money, he has no choice, this is the future for him and his kids. 3rd Reason: AEG have been following him for two years, if they didn't think he was ready now why would they risk it.

Emily Ratajkowski is a showman, on and off the stage. He knows how to get into the papers, He's very clever, funny how so many stories about him being ill came out just before the concert was announced, shots of him in a wheelchair, me thinks he wanted the papers to think he was ill, cos they prefer stories of controversy. Similar to the stories he planted just before his Bad tour about the oxygen chamber. Worked a treat lol. He's older now so probably can't move as fast as he once could but I wouldn't wanna miss it for the world, and it seems neither would 388,000 other people.

Dianne Reeves US News HienaLouca





https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/03/27/19/11535148-6857039-Kim_Foxx_the_recused_Cook_County_State_s_Attorney_who_is_facing_-a-26_1553716156148.jpg