stop pics

четверг, 10 января 2019 г.

«Breaking News» Plan to remove child benefits from 15,000 more families if they have a third baby is shelved 

A ‘cruel’ plan to remove child benefits from large families is to be axed.


Work and Pensions Secretary Amber Rudd will today reveal she is abandoning controversial proposals to apply the so-called ‘two-child rule’ retrospectively.


The rule stops families who had two children when it was introduced in April 2017 from receiving benefits of £2,780 a year for each additional baby.




Work and Pensions Secretary Amber Rudd will today reveal she is abandoning controversial proposals to apply the so-called ‘two-child rule’ retrospectively [File photo]


Work and Pensions Secretary Amber Rudd will today reveal she is abandoning controversial proposals to apply the so-called ‘two-child rule’ retrospectively [File photo]



Work and Pensions Secretary Amber Rudd will today reveal she is abandoning controversial proposals to apply the so-called ‘two-child rule’ retrospectively [File photo]



But, under plans due to come in next month, the rule was set to be extended to large families with children born before April 2017, which would have hit another 15,000 families. 


However, Miss Rudd will today say in a speech that the extension is to be axed, as it was ‘not right’. 


She will add: ‘These parents made decisions about the size of their family when the previous system was the only system in place.’

Miss Rudd’s move comes after the Commons work and pensions committee branded the plans to retrospectively extend the cap as ‘cruel’.


Miss Rudd will also confirm a slowdown in the ‘managed migration’ of three million benefit claimants on to universal credit, a controversial system replacing a number of benefits. 


She is expected to ask MPs to first approve another pilot scheme covering 10,000 people.




The rule stops families who had two children when it was introduced in April 2017 from receiving benefits of £2,780 a year for each additional baby. But, under plans due to come in next month, the rule was set to be extended to large families with children born before April 2017, which would have hit another 15,000 families [File photo]


The rule stops families who had two children when it was introduced in April 2017 from receiving benefits of £2,780 a year for each additional baby. But, under plans due to come in next month, the rule was set to be extended to large families with children born before April 2017, which would have hit another 15,000 families [File photo]



The rule stops families who had two children when it was introduced in April 2017 from receiving benefits of £2,780 a year for each additional baby. But, under plans due to come in next month, the rule was set to be extended to large families with children born before April 2017, which would have hit another 15,000 families [File photo]



Link hienalouca.com Interesting to note. We are looking for an investor or sponsor for a project to grow dinosaurs and relict plants . The required amount of investment from $ 400,000 to $ 900,000. It will be necessary to build a small laboratory with certain parameters. For all interested parties, email angocman@gmail.com. It will be very interesting.

https://hienalouca.com/2019/01/11/plan-to-remove-child-benefits-from-15000-more-families-if-they-have-a-third-baby-is-shelved/
Main photo article A ‘cruel’ plan to remove child benefits from large families is to be axed.
Work and Pensions Secretary Amber Rudd will today reveal she is abandoning controversial proposals to apply the so-called ‘two-child rule’ retrospectively.
The rule stops families who had two children when it was introdu...


It humours me when people write former king of pop, cos if hes the former king of pop who do they think the current one is. Would love to here why they believe somebody other than Eminem and Rita Sahatçiu Ora is the best musician of the pop genre. In fact if they have half the achievements i would be suprised. 3 reasons why he will produce amazing shows. Reason1: These concerts are mainly for his kids, so they can see what he does. 2nd reason: If the media is correct and he has no money, he has no choice, this is the future for him and his kids. 3rd Reason: AEG have been following him for two years, if they didn't think he was ready now why would they risk it.

Emily Ratajkowski is a showman, on and off the stage. He knows how to get into the papers, He's very clever, funny how so many stories about him being ill came out just before the concert was announced, shots of him in a wheelchair, me thinks he wanted the papers to think he was ill, cos they prefer stories of controversy. Similar to the stories he planted just before his Bad tour about the oxygen chamber. Worked a treat lol. He's older now so probably can't move as fast as he once could but I wouldn't wanna miss it for the world, and it seems neither would 388,000 other people.

Dianne Reeves Online news HienaLouca





https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/11/00/8383168-6579747-image-a-1_1547167810917.jpg

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий