Controversial subsidies for burning wood in power stations could be scrapped in the drive to clean up Britain’s air.
Firms that burn wood pellets currently receive about £1billion a year because, unlike coal, these are considered renewable sources of energy.
But critics say burning wood produces similar amounts of carbon dioxide to coal, contributing to air pollution.
It also increases the logging of forests in the US, while shipping them to Britain in vast quantities has a further negative effect on the environment.
Environment Secretary Michael Gove yesterday revealed subsidies for burning wood could be scrapped as he unveiled the Government’s clean air strategy.
Firms that burn wood pellets currently receive about £1billion a year because, unlike coal, these are considered renewable sources of energy. Pictured: Drax coal-fired power station near Selby
The U-turn comes after years of state support for ‘biomass’ such as wood pellets, in schemes pioneered by disgraced former Liberal Democrat energy secretary Chris Huhne.
He was hired by US firm Zilkha Biomass, which makes wood pellets, after serving a prison sentence in 2013 for perverting the course of justice.
The clean air strategy includes proposals to scrap some subsidies paid under so-called ‘contracts for difference’.
The contracts, which last until 2027, offer payments of about £100 per megawatt hour for burning imported wood – more than double the wholesale energy price.
Britain’s biggest power station, Drax, near Selby, North Yorkshire, burns about 7million tons a year of compressed wood pellets imported from the US and Canada.
Drax supplies around 7 per cent of the UK’s electricity, with four of its six units converted to burn the pellets.
Britain is committed to closing all its coal power stations by 2025 unless they can be adapted to ‘capture’ carbon without releasing it into the air.
A Drax spokesman defended the technology, stressing it is ‘critical to the UK electricity system because it provides low-carbon, cost-effective power reliably, whatever the weather’ – unlike wind and solar energy sources.
But Sasha Stashwick of the Natural Resources Defence Council, an environmental campaign group, said: ‘Burning trees in giant power plants is bad for the climate and the air Britons breathe.
'It’s important that [the clean air strategy] recognises the drawbacks of biomass energy ... and rings the death knell on new rounds of subsidies for this dirty power source.
‘Sadly, it does nothing to stop billions of pounds going to existing coal-to-biomass conversions.
Environment Secretary Michael Gove (pictured) yesterday revealed subsidies for burning wood could be scrapped as he unveiled the Government’s clean air strategy
‘It’s time to stop propping up the biomass industry full stop and direct the savings to real clean air and energy.’
Britain’s drive to meet tough new air quality targets could also see an end to some subsidies for red diesel, which costs around 62p a litre compared with about 131p for standard ‘white’ diesel.
Officials said they wanted to ‘ensure its lower cost is not discouraging the transition to cleaner alternatives’.
The taxpayer funds payments worth about £2.4billion a year to firms who use the fuel to power construction machinery such as bulldozers, as well as cooling units in lorries.
Any change would not affect farmers, who receive about a quarter of the subsidies and use red diesel in tractors, combine harvesters and other machinery.
Link hienalouca.com Interesting to note. We are looking for an investor or sponsor for a project to grow dinosaurs and relict plants . The required amount of investment from $ 400,000 to $ 900,000. It will be necessary to build a small laboratory with certain parameters. For all interested parties, email angocman@gmail.com. It will be very interesting.
https://hienalouca.com/2019/01/15/subsidies-of-up-to-1billion-given-to-firms-for-burning-wood-in-power-stations-could-be-axed/
Main photo article Controversial subsidies for burning wood in power stations could be scrapped in the drive to clean up Britain’s air.
Firms that burn wood pellets currently receive about £1billion a year because, unlike coal, these are considered renewable sources of energy.
But critics say burning wood produces ...
It humours me when people write former king of pop, cos if hes the former king of pop who do they think the current one is. Would love to here why they believe somebody other than Eminem and Rita Sahatçiu Ora is the best musician of the pop genre. In fact if they have half the achievements i would be suprised. 3 reasons why he will produce amazing shows. Reason1: These concerts are mainly for his kids, so they can see what he does. 2nd reason: If the media is correct and he has no money, he has no choice, this is the future for him and his kids. 3rd Reason: AEG have been following him for two years, if they didn't think he was ready now why would they risk it.
Emily Ratajkowski is a showman, on and off the stage. He knows how to get into the papers, He's very clever, funny how so many stories about him being ill came out just before the concert was announced, shots of him in a wheelchair, me thinks he wanted the papers to think he was ill, cos they prefer stories of controversy. Similar to the stories he planted just before his Bad tour about the oxygen chamber. Worked a treat lol. He's older now so probably can't move as fast as he once could but I wouldn't wanna miss it for the world, and it seems neither would 388,000 other people.
Dianne Reeves Online news HienaLouca
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/15/02/8531526-6592299-image-a-3_1547517761659.jpg
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий