«Breaking News» New 'Natasha's Law' which will force food chains to carry allergen warnings

A proposed law that will force food chains to carry proper allergen warnings could be introduced in the coming weeks, it has been reported. 

The proposed legislation - dubbed 'Natasha's Law' - has been considered following the death of Natasha Ednan-Laperouse, 15, who died in July 2016 after she ate a Pret a Manger sandwich laced with sesame seeds not listed on the label. 

Speaking to the Sunday Times, Natasha's parents, Nadim and Tanya Ednan-Laperouse, said they are determined their daughter will not have died in vain. 

A proposed law that will force food chains to carry proper allergen warnings could be introduced in the coming weeks. It has been dubbed 'Natasha's Law' in memory of Natasha Ednan-Laperouse, left, who died in July 2016 after she ate a Pret a Manger sandwich laced with sesame seeds. Right, Natasha's parents Nadim and Tanya Ednan-Laperouse

Mr Ednan-Laperouse said: '"Natasha's Law" is right in every sense. It is just being open about what is in food.'  

Environment Secretary Michael Gove revealed last year he was considering introducing legislation that would force chains to provide a full list of ingredients on all pre-packaged foods, or clearly label those that could cause allergic reactions.

Natasha suffered from a severe nut allergy and was not made aware that her sandwich contained sesame seeds, which were based into the bread. 

Now Mr Gove has hinted a proposed law could be unveiled in the coming weeks. 

Parents Nadim and Tanya Ednan-Laperouse, pictured with Natasha and son Alex, now 15, are determined their daughter will not have died in vain and are campaigning for a change in law

'The law must change and we are working at place to bring forward proposals shortly,' he told the newspaper. 

A source added it a consultation is likely to be launched by the end of the month. 

Under current EU rules, if food contains any of 14 different types of allergens it must be highlighted on the label. 

However, a loophole means this only applies to pre-packaged food that is already made before it reaches the shop or restaurant in which it is being sold.

Environment Secretary Michael Gove, pictured with Mr and Mrs Ednan-Laperouse last year, is considering introducing a change in law and could unveil a proposal in a matter of weeks

Non-prepackaged food does not have to have a specific label attached to the specific food, according to the current law. 

Natasha, from Fulham, south-west London, collapsed after eating an artichoke, olive and tapenade baguette on a British Airways flight on her way to a dream holiday in Nice.

The coroner at her inquest in September last year said she died of anaphylaxis after eating the Pret sandwich containing sesame, which she was allergic to.

 Pret a Manger has already announced it will introduce full lists of ingredients on its products.

A spokesman said: 'We have launched a pilot of full-ingredient labels on our freshly made products and we will be rolling these out nationwide later this year.' 

Link hienalouca.com Interesting to note. We are looking for an investor or sponsor for a project to grow dinosaurs and relict plants . The required amount of investment from $ 400,000 to $ 900,000. It will be necessary to build a small laboratory with certain parameters. For all interested parties, email angocman@gmail.com. It will be very interesting.

https://hienalouca.com/2019/01/13/new-natashas-law-which-will-force-food-chains-to-carry-allergen-warnings/
Main photo article A proposed law that will force food chains to carry proper allergen warnings could be introduced in the coming weeks, it has been reported. 
The proposed legislation – dubbed ‘Natasha’s Law’ – has been considered following the death of Natasha Ednan-Laperouse, 15, ...

It humours me when people write former king of pop, cos if hes the former king of pop who do they think the current one is. Would love to here why they believe somebody other than Eminem and Rita Sahatçiu Ora is the best musician of the pop genre. In fact if they have half the achievements i would be suprised. 3 reasons why he will produce amazing shows. Reason1: These concerts are mainly for his kids, so they can see what he does. 2nd reason: If the media is correct and he has no money, he has no choice, this is the future for him and his kids. 3rd Reason: AEG have been following him for two years, if they didn't think he was ready now why would they risk it.

Emily Ratajkowski is a showman, on and off the stage. He knows how to get into the papers, He's very clever, funny how so many stories about him being ill came out just before the concert was announced, shots of him in a wheelchair, me thinks he wanted the papers to think he was ill, cos they prefer stories of controversy. Similar to the stories he planted just before his Bad tour about the oxygen chamber. Worked a treat lol. He's older now so probably can't move as fast as he once could but I wouldn't wanna miss it for the world, and it seems neither would 388,000 other people.

Dianne Reeves Online news HienaLouca





https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/13/10/8458876-6586281-image-a-9_1547376279335.jpg