stop pics

среда, 14 ноября 2018 г.

«Breaking News» Senate OKs Coast Guard bill with ballast water compromise

TRAVERSE CITY, Mich. (AP) - The U.S. Senate approved a compromise policy Wednesday on dumping ship ballast water in coastal ports and the Great Lakes, a practice blamed for spreading invasive species that damage the environment and the economy.


The plan, part of a $10.6 billion Coast Guard budget authorization bill, includes provisions sought by environmentalists as well as the cargo shipping industry. They have battled for years over how to regulate disposal of water stored in tanks that is essential for steadying vessels in rough seas but has brought unwanted mussels, fish and even viruses to U.S. waters.


Under the bill, approved 94-6 and sent to the House for consideration, the Environmental Protection Agency would set national rules for ballast and other water discharges while the Coast Guard would enforce them. An earlier version backed by industry would have put the Coast Guard in charge of regulation and exempted ballast from the Clean Water Act, which environmentalists feared would result in weaker requirements for treating the water before it's released.


But in a victory for shippers, states would be prohibited from imposing tougher treatment rules than EPA's. Presently, 26 states have rules in addition to those on federal level, creating what the industry describes as a confusing regulatory patchwork. Environmentalists contend states should be able to exceed federal standards to safeguard their waterways.


The bill creates an exception for the Great Lakes, where damages and control costs from quagga mussels and other exotic organisms reach $200 million annually. Regional requirements could be imposed there if enough of the eight states that border the lakes want them.


Republican Sen. Rob Portman of Ohio and Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow of Michigan, co-chairs of the Senate Great Lakes Task Force, said EPA policy required under the bill "will help prevent pollution and ensure that that ballast water does not transport invasive species from one body of water to another along a vessel's shipping route, while providing greater regulatory certainty for the shipping industry."




FILE - In this July of 1999 file photo, a freighter is silhouetted in Lake Superior near Whitefish Point, Mich. The U.S. Senate has approved a new policy on ships that dump ballast water in coastal ports and the Great Lakes, a practice blamed for spreading invasive species that damage the environment and the economy. The ballast plan is contained in a $10.6 billion Coast Guard budget authorization bill passed Wednesday Nov. 14, 2018. It now goes to the House for consideration. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio File)


FILE - In this July of 1999 file photo, a freighter is silhouetted in Lake Superior near Whitefish Point, Mich. The U.S. Senate has approved a new policy on ships that dump ballast water in coastal ports and the Great Lakes, a practice blamed for spreading invasive species that damage the environment and the economy. The ballast plan is contained in a $10.6 billion Coast Guard budget authorization bill passed Wednesday Nov. 14, 2018. It now goes to the House for consideration. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio File)



FILE - In this July of 1999 file photo, a freighter is silhouetted in Lake Superior near Whitefish Point, Mich. The U.S. Senate has approved a new policy on ships that dump ballast water in coastal ports and the Great Lakes, a practice blamed for spreading invasive species that damage the environment and the economy. The ballast plan is contained in a $10.6 billion Coast Guard budget authorization bill passed Wednesday Nov. 14, 2018. It now goes to the House for consideration. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio File)



Debate will persist even if the measure is enacted. Federal policy currently limits numbers of live organisms in ballast water before it's discharged, based on international standards that environmentalists contend are too weak. A federal court has ordered EPA to strengthen the standards, noting the availability of treatment tools such as chlorine, ultraviolet light and filtration. Shippers contend available technology can't hit the cleanliness targets environmentalists want.


EPA will grapple with such issues as it develops national rules.


Still, both sides praised the bill. The Lake Carriers' Association, representing Great Lakes cargo shippers, said it strikes a "good balance," while an environmentalist coalition said it "upholds many core protections to prevent future invasions."


The bill authorizes $10.6 billion for the Coast Guard in fiscal year 2019, a roughly 16 percent increase from 2017 that would help modernize its aging fleet of cutters and aircraft. The Coast Guard is the primary federal authority for maritime safety and security on the U.S. coast and in ports and inland waterways.


"Passing it will ensure the Coast Guard has the tools it needs to continue to carry out its many important missions," said Sen. Bill Nelson, a Florida Democrat.


The measure also contains provisions to help the agency crack down on drug smuggling and enforce borders through use of informants and greater cooperation with other agencies. It also boost efforts to place and maintain navigational aids and enter less expensive contracts for acquiring the largest and most technologically advanced cutters.


Other provisions would create a Coast Guard center to develop responses to oil spills in the Great Lakes and other freshwater environments and authorize funding to design and build a National Coast Guard Museum in New London, Connecticut.


___


AP reporter Kevin Freking in Washington, D.C., contributed to this story.


Linkhienalouca.com

https://hienalouca.com/2018/11/15/senate-oks-coast-guard-bill-with-ballast-water-compromise/
Main photo article TRAVERSE CITY, Mich. (AP) – The U.S. Senate approved a compromise policy Wednesday on dumping ship ballast water in coastal ports and the Great Lakes, a practice blamed for spreading invasive species that damage the environment and the economy.
The plan, part of a $10.6 billion Coast Guard...


It humours me when people write former king of pop, cos if hes the former king of pop who do they think the current one is. Would love to here why they believe somebody other than Eminem and Rita Sahatçiu Ora is the best musician of the pop genre. In fact if they have half the achievements i would be suprised. 3 reasons why he will produce amazing shows. Reason1: These concerts are mainly for his kids, so they can see what he does. 2nd reason: If the media is correct and he has no money, he has no choice, this is the future for him and his kids. 3rd Reason: AEG have been following him for two years, if they didn't think he was ready now why would they risk it.

Emily Ratajkowski is a showman, on and off the stage. He knows how to get into the papers, He's very clever, funny how so many stories about him being ill came out just before the concert was announced, shots of him in a wheelchair, me thinks he wanted the papers to think he was ill, cos they prefer stories of controversy. Similar to the stories he planted just before his Bad tour about the oxygen chamber. Worked a treat lol. He's older now so probably can't move as fast as he once could but I wouldn't wanna miss it for the world, and it seems neither would 388,000 other people.

Dianne Reeves Online news HienaLouca





https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2018/11/14/23/wire-6198936-1542239684-603_634x422.jpg

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий