stop pics

воскресенье, 16 сентября 2018 г.

«Breaking News» Calpol to children under two years old could increase risk of getting asthma

Children given paracetamol in their first two years of life may be at greater risk of asthma, a study has found.


Paracetamol is recommended by the NHS to treat most kinds of childhood ailments, including headache, stomach ache and cold symptoms, while it can also be used to reduce fever. The leading brand is Calpol.


Researchers looked at 620 children who were considered at high risk of an allergic disease because they had a family member with illnesses such as asthma, eczema, hay fever or a severe food allergy.




Giving Calpol to children under two years old could increase risk of getting asthma, major study finds


Giving Calpol to children under two years old could increase risk of getting asthma, major study finds



Giving Calpol to children under two years old could increase risk of getting asthma, major study finds



They rang families every four weeks for the first 15 months, then at 18 months and at two years to ask how many days the child had had paracetamol in the previous weeks.


When the children reached 18, they gave a blood or saliva sample which was tested for variants of the cell-protecting GST gene.


Researchers found one variant of the GSTP1 gene was associated with almost twice the risk of developing asthma.

PhD student Xin Dai said: 'We found that children with the ... variant had 1.8 times higher risk of developing asthma by the age of 18 years.


'Our findings provide more evidence that paracetamol use in infancy may have an adverse effect on respiratory health for children with particular genetic profiles and could be a possible cause of asthma.





One professor said: 'The problem is that children are not given paracetamol early in life for no reason. They are often given it because they have respiratory infection


One professor said: 'The problem is that children are not given paracetamol early in life for no reason. They are often given it because they have respiratory infection






One professor said: 'The problem is that children are not given paracetamol early in life for no reason. They are often given it because they have respiratory infection


One professor said: 'The problem is that children are not given paracetamol early in life for no reason. They are often given it because they have respiratory infection



One professor said: 'The problem is that children are not given paracetamol early in life for no reason. They are often given it because they have respiratory infection



'There is mounting evidence that the GST superfamily of genes, including three major classes ... are associated with various diseases, including cancers, asthma, atherosclerosis, allergies, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease. Our study adds to this body of evidence.'


However, Professor Neil Pearce, from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said: 'The problem is that children are not given paracetamol early in life for no reason. They are often given it because they have respiratory infection.


'It may be the infection which increases the risk of asthma, not the paracetamol.'


The study by the University of Melbourne was presented to the European Respiratory Society International Congress in Paris.


Johnson & Johnson, the makers of Calpol, did not reply to a request for comment.


Link hienalouca.com

https://hienalouca.com/2018/09/17/calpol-to-children-under-two-years-old-could-increase-risk-of-getting-asthma/
Main photo article Children given paracetamol in their first two years of life may be at greater risk of asthma, a study has found.
Paracetamol is recommended by the NHS to treat most kinds of childhood ailments, including headache, stomach ache and cold symptoms, while it can also be used to reduce fever. The...


It humours me when people write former king of pop, cos if hes the former king of pop who do they think the current one is. Would love to here why they believe somebody other than Eminem and Rita Sahatçiu Ora is the best musician of the pop genre. In fact if they have half the achievements i would be suprised. 3 reasons why he will produce amazing shows. Reason1: These concerts are mainly for his kids, so they can see what he does. 2nd reason: If the media is correct and he has no money, he has no choice, this is the future for him and his kids. 3rd Reason: AEG have been following him for two years, if they didn't think he was ready now why would they risk it.

Emily Ratajkowski is a showman, on and off the stage. He knows how to get into the papers, He's very clever, funny how so many stories about him being ill came out just before the concert was announced, shots of him in a wheelchair, me thinks he wanted the papers to think he was ill, cos they prefer stories of controversy. Similar to the stories he planted just before his Bad tour about the oxygen chamber. Worked a treat lol. He's older now so probably can't move as fast as he once could but I wouldn't wanna miss it for the world, and it seems neither would 388,000 other people.

Dianne Reeves US News HienaLouca





https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/newpix/2018/09/16/21/00170CD200000258-6174097-image-a-56_1537129866433.jpg

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий