Apple is under fire for a blunder on its latest emoji.
The iPhone maker is guilty of designing a squid emoji that, according to several experts, is anatomically incorrect.
The error stems from the placement of the squid's siphon, a muscular structure that helps with respiration, propulsion and excreting waste.
Scroll down for video
Apple is under fire for a blunder on its latest emoji. The iPhone maker is guilty of designing a squid emoji that, according to several experts, is anatomically incorrect
Siphons are usually located on the rear side of a squid's mantle.
But in this case, Apple placed it in between the squid emoji's eyes - resulting in a 'weirdo nose,' as the Monterey Bay Aquarium put it.
The controversy stemmed from tweets published by the Monterey Bay Aquarium late last week, which took issue with the emoji.
In a series of clever tweets, the aquarium wrote: 'Apple's squid emoji is upside down.'
'The siphon should be behind the head...It just looks like a weirdo nose,' the Monterey Bay Aquarium added.
Siphons are located on the rear side of a squid's mantle (pictured). In this case, Apple placed it in between the emoji's eyes - resulting in a 'weirdo nose,' as the Monterey Bay Aquarium noted
The original tweet calling out the emoji was retweeted hundreds of times and was liked by nearly 2,000 users.
The emoji was subsequently scrutinized by a variety of experts, including one who said the design goof would be akin to if a human had a 'butt on [their] forehead.'
'The way they move is with jet propulsion,' Sarah McAnulty, a squid expert and PhD candidate at the University of Connecticut, told Gizmodo.
'So basically, they take a bunch of water into their mantle and then use their muscular torso muscles, kind of, to squeeze it through a hole that's called the siphon, or the funnel.'
McAnulty added that she and other squid experts made fun of the anatomical error.
'I didn't want to say anything for fear of it getting taken away,' McAnulty said.
Many users took Apple to task - a few with some particularly cringe-worthy puns - on Twitter.
As Gizmodo pointed out, per the Unicode Consortium rules, this emoji will stay the way that it is for a whole two years before it's fixed.
It also seems that one of Apple's designers is to blame for the error, as other emoji representations of the squid don't feature siphons.
For example, Google, Facebook and Microsoft's squid emoji emit a siphon entirely.
It's not the first time Apple has encountered some backlash with its animal emoji.
One of Apple's designers is to blame for the error, as other emoji representations of the squid don't feature siphons. Pictured is Microsoft's squid emoji (left) and Facebook's emoji (right)
Pictured is Google's squid emoji. As Gizmodo pointed out, per the Unicode Consortium rules, Apple's squid emoji will stay the way that it is for a whole two years before it's fixed
Many are frustrated over the fact that Apple's octopus emoji only has four legs, while a previous version of its lobster emoji featured six legs, before it was later corrected to have the correct number of eight legs.
And that's after Apple just overcame its infamous 'bagelgate,' which involved the outrage over its bagel emoji which many claimed looked too 'stale.'
The firm went on to correct it by adding an appropriately realistic smear of cream cheese.
Link hienalouca.com
https://hienalouca.com/2018/12/11/it-would-be-like-having-a-butt-on-your-forehead-apple-under-fire-for-upside-down-squid-emoji/
Main photo article Apple is under fire for a blunder on its latest emoji.
The iPhone maker is guilty of designing a squid emoji that, according to several experts, is anatomically incorrect.
The error stems from the placement of the squid’s siphon, a muscular structure that helps with respiration, p...
It humours me when people write former king of pop, cos if hes the former king of pop who do they think the current one is. Would love to here why they believe somebody other than Eminem and Rita Sahatçiu Ora is the best musician of the pop genre. In fact if they have half the achievements i would be suprised. 3 reasons why he will produce amazing shows. Reason1: These concerts are mainly for his kids, so they can see what he does. 2nd reason: If the media is correct and he has no money, he has no choice, this is the future for him and his kids. 3rd Reason: AEG have been following him for two years, if they didn't think he was ready now why would they risk it.
Emily Ratajkowski is a showman, on and off the stage. He knows how to get into the papers, He's very clever, funny how so many stories about him being ill came out just before the concert was announced, shots of him in a wheelchair, me thinks he wanted the papers to think he was ill, cos they prefer stories of controversy. Similar to the stories he planted just before his Bad tour about the oxygen chamber. Worked a treat lol. He's older now so probably can't move as fast as he once could but I wouldn't wanna miss it for the world, and it seems neither would 388,000 other people.
Dianne Reeves US News HienaLouca
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2018/12/11/00/7263170-6481463-Apple_is_under_fire_for_a_blunder_on_its_latest_emoji_The_iPhone-a-16_1544486934485.jpg
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий