stop pics

воскресенье, 16 декабря 2018 г.

«Breaking News» How could a second referendum on Brexit happen?

Talk about a second referendum on Brexit is getting louder by the week - with reports today suggesting it is now a live issue inside Downing Street.


Despite a growing clamour holding a new vote is a complicated and lengthy process, requiring new laws, agreement on a question - and a delay to Brexit day on March 29.


Theresa May has insisted repeatedly that a new referendum would betray Leave voters in 2016 and will not happen on her watch.


But Parliament could force the PM into the decision if it rejects her divorce deal by the expected landslide in January - prompting Nigel Farage to tell Leave campaigners to prepare for another vote.




Theresa May has insisted repeatedly that a new referendum would betray Leave voters in 2016 and will not happen on her watch - but Parliament could force her into it 


Theresa May has insisted repeatedly that a new referendum would betray Leave voters in 2016 and will not happen on her watch - but Parliament could force her into it 



Theresa May has insisted repeatedly that a new referendum would betray Leave voters in 2016 and will not happen on her watch - but Parliament could force her into it 



Why do people say there needs to be a second referendum?


Theresa May's Brexit deal has no majority in Parliament - and it is not clear any other deal has a majority either, even if one could be negotiated.


Passing the question back to voters is seen by some as a way to end the impasse and give a clear instruction to politicians on what to do.


Some campaigners also say the 2016 referendum was not an informed choice because too many of the implications of Leave were unknown. 


What do critics think?


Many people - led by the Prime Minister herself - say a new vote on Brexit would betray the people who voted Leave in 2016. They insist there was a clear order from the public to Leave the EU and politicians must follow it, working out the details for themselves.


Unionists also complain that accepting a new referendum on Brexit would pave the way for another referendum on Scottish independence, threatening the future of the UK. 


Some politicians also feel it would simply reopen the wounds from the 2016 battle without really deciding anything more clearly.  

What needs to happen for a referendum to happen?


Parliament would need to pass a new law for a referendum to be held. This process alone would take weeks and would likely be very controversial.


Before that can even happen, for political reasons there would probably have to be some kind of moment creating a 'mandate' for a new referendum as it is something neither of the main parties promised at the last election.


This might be a simple vote of MPs after Mrs May's deal has been rejected. The Government could call such a vote at any time. Labour also has some opportunities to call a vote - though winning such a vote would have less power.


It could even be a whole general election where one or more sides puts a new referendum in their manifesto. 


What would the question and be who decides? 


Nobody knows for sure - and this is probably the hardest question of all.


Some say it should be a simple repeat of last time, with Leave or Remain on the ballot paper. Others say it should be Remain versus Mrs May's Brexit deal.


Others advocate a two stage referendum - between Remain and Leave, followed by Mrs May's deal versus No Deal if Leave wins. 


Still others say there could be multiple questions on the ballot paper, possible using a ranking system known as alternative vote.


The Electoral Commission would make a recommendation and MPs would make the final decision on what the question would be. 


Would exit have to be delayed from March 29? 


Yes. On the shortest timescale imaginable, a referendum would take almost six months from the point the decision was taken - something which has not happened yet. Exit day is less than four months away.




A new referendum would take almost six months - at least - to pass the necessary laws, establish campaigns and actually have the battle at the ballot box 


A new referendum would take almost six months - at least - to pass the necessary laws, establish campaigns and actually have the battle at the ballot box 



A new referendum would take almost six months - at least - to pass the necessary laws, establish campaigns and actually have the battle at the ballot box 



How long does it take to call and fight a referendum? 


There is no fixed schedule but former Cabinet minister Justine Greening last month set out a 22 week timetable - just under six months start to finish


This assumes about 11 weeks to pass the necessary laws and another 11 weeks for the campaign - both a preliminary period to set up formal campaigns on each side and then a main short campaign.


This would in theory allow a referendum by mid June 2019 - a full three years after the last one. 


Lots of factors could cause delays and short of sweeping political agreement on the rules of a campaign almost no way to speed up the process. 


Would the result be any more decisive?


Probably not. Unlike last time, the referendum law could make the result legally binding and the question could be more specific than last time.


But polls suggest the country remains just as divided as in 2016 - suggesting the result could be just as close as the 52% to 48% Leave win next time.   


Link hienalouca.com

https://hienalouca.com/2018/12/16/how-could-a-second-referendum-on-brexit-happen/
Main photo article Talk about a second referendum on Brexit is getting louder by the week – with reports today suggesting it is now a live issue inside Downing Street.
Despite a growing clamour holding a new vote is a complicated and lengthy process, requiring new laws, agreement on a question – and a...


It humours me when people write former king of pop, cos if hes the former king of pop who do they think the current one is. Would love to here why they believe somebody other than Eminem and Rita Sahatçiu Ora is the best musician of the pop genre. In fact if they have half the achievements i would be suprised. 3 reasons why he will produce amazing shows. Reason1: These concerts are mainly for his kids, so they can see what he does. 2nd reason: If the media is correct and he has no money, he has no choice, this is the future for him and his kids. 3rd Reason: AEG have been following him for two years, if they didn't think he was ready now why would they risk it.

Emily Ratajkowski is a showman, on and off the stage. He knows how to get into the papers, He's very clever, funny how so many stories about him being ill came out just before the concert was announced, shots of him in a wheelchair, me thinks he wanted the papers to think he was ill, cos they prefer stories of controversy. Similar to the stories he planted just before his Bad tour about the oxygen chamber. Worked a treat lol. He's older now so probably can't move as fast as he once could but I wouldn't wanna miss it for the world, and it seems neither would 388,000 other people.

Dianne Reeves Online news HienaLouca





https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2018/12/16/14/7490244-0-image-a-30_1544968879729.jpg

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий