The Trump administration has separated 81 migrant children from their families at the U.S.-Mexico border despite issuing an executive order in June to end the practice, according to government data obtained by The Associated Press.
In spite of Trump's order and a federal judge's later ruling, immigration officials are allowed to separate a child from a parent in certain cases - for instance, serious criminal charges against a parent, concerns over the health and welfare of a child or medical concerns.
Those caveats were in place before the zero-tolerance policy that prompted the earlier separations at the border.
Immigrant rights advocates said they are worried that the government gets to decide whether a child fits into those areas of concern, noting that parents could be falsely labeled as criminals.


Migrants traveling with children walk up a hill to a waiting U.S. Border Patrol agent just inside San Ysidro, Calif., after climbing over the border wall from Playas de Tijuana, Mexico, Monday, Dec. 3, 2018. Thousands of Central American migrants who traveled with recent caravans want to seek asylum in the United States but face a decision between crossing illegally or waiting months, because the U.S. government only processes a limited number of those cases a day at the San Ysidro border crossing. (AP Photo/Rebecca Blackwell)
From June 21, the day after President Donald Trump's order, through Tuesday, 76 adults were separated from the children, according to the data. Of those, 51 were criminally prosecuted - 31 with criminal histories and 20 for other, unspecified reasons, according to the data.
Nine were hospitalized, 10 had gang affiliations and four had extraditable warrants, according to the immigration data. Two were separated because of prior immigration violations and orders of removal, according to the data.
'The welfare of children in our custody is paramount,' said Katie Waldman, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees U.S. immigration enforcement. 'As we have already said - and the numbers show: Separations are rare. While there was a brief increase during zero tolerance as more adults were prosecuted, the numbers have returned to their prior levels.'
At its height over the summer, more than 2,400 children were separated. The practice sparked global outrage from politicians, humanitarians and religious groups who called it cruel and callous. Images of weeping children and anguished, confused parents were splashed across newspapers and television.
A federal judge hearing a lawsuit brought by a mother who had been separated from her child barred further separations and ordered the government to reunite the families.
But the judge, Dana Sabraw, left the caveats in place and gave the option to challenge further separations on an individual basis.
American Civil Liberties Union attorney Lee Gelernt, who sued on behalf of the mother, said he hoped the judge would order the government to alert them to any new separations, because right now the attorneys don't know about them and therefore can't challenge them.
'We are very concerned the government may be separating families based on vague allegations of criminal history,' Gelernt said.
According to the government data, from April 19 - September 30, 170 family units were separated because they were found to not be related - that included 197 adults and 139 minors. That could also include grandparents or other relatives if there was no proof of relationship.
Many people fleeing poverty or violence leave their homes in a rush and don't have birth certificates or formal documents with them.
Other separations were because the children were not minors, the data showed.
During the budget year 2017, which began in October 2016 and ended in September 2017, 1,065 family units were separated, which usually means a child and a parent - 46 due to fraud and 1,019 due to medical or security concerns, according to data.
Waldman said the data showed 'unequivocally that smugglers, human traffickers, and nefarious actors are attempting to use hundreds of children to exploit our immigration laws in hopes of gaining entry to the United States.'
Thousands of migrants have come up from Central America in recent weeks as part of caravans. Trump, a Republican, used his national security powers to put in place regulations that denied asylum to anyone caught crossing illegally, but a judge has halted that change as a lawsuit progresses.
The zero tolerance policy over the summer was meant in part to deter families from illegally crossing the border. Trump administration officials say the large increase in the number of Central American families coming between ports of entry has vastly strained the system.
But the policy - and what it would mean for parents - caught some federal agencies off guard. There was no system in place to track parents along with their children, in part because after 72 hours children are turned over to a different agency, the Department of Health and Human Services, which has been tasked with caring for them.
An October report by Homeland Security's watchdog found immigration officials were not prepared to manage the consequences of the policy. The resulting confusion along the border led to misinformation among separated parents who did not know why they had been taken from their children or how to reach them, longer detention for children at border facilities meant for short-term stays and difficulty in identifying and reuniting families.
Backlogs at ports of entry may have pushed some into illegally crossing the U.S-Mexico border, the report found.
Link hienalouca.com
https://hienalouca.com/2018/12/07/81-migrant-children-separated-from-parents-since-trump-executive-order-to-end-the-practice/
Main photo article The Trump administration has separated 81 migrant children from their families at the U.S.-Mexico border despite issuing an executive order in June to end the practice, according to government data obtained by The Associated Press.
In spite of Trump’s order and a federal judge’s...
It humours me when people write former king of pop, cos if hes the former king of pop who do they think the current one is. Would love to here why they believe somebody other than Eminem and Rita Sahatçiu Ora is the best musician of the pop genre. In fact if they have half the achievements i would be suprised. 3 reasons why he will produce amazing shows. Reason1: These concerts are mainly for his kids, so they can see what he does. 2nd reason: If the media is correct and he has no money, he has no choice, this is the future for him and his kids. 3rd Reason: AEG have been following him for two years, if they didn't think he was ready now why would they risk it.
Emily Ratajkowski is a showman, on and off the stage. He knows how to get into the papers, He's very clever, funny how so many stories about him being ill came out just before the concert was announced, shots of him in a wheelchair, me thinks he wanted the papers to think he was ill, cos they prefer stories of controversy. Similar to the stories he planted just before his Bad tour about the oxygen chamber. Worked a treat lol. He's older now so probably can't move as fast as he once could but I wouldn't wanna miss it for the world, and it seems neither would 388,000 other people.
Dianne Reeves US News HienaLouca
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2018/12/06/18/wire-7102460-1544119542-653_634x434.jpg
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий