Vice chancellors at more than 120 universities were paid a higher salary than Theresa May last year.
Data from the Office for Students (OfS) shows that 1.5 percent of staff in the sector receive a basic salary of more than £100,000 a year - a rise of 1.3% in 2016/17.
Altogether, 124 of the 133 universities across England paid their heads more than the £150,000 salary the Prime Minister earns - with one taking home almost £500,000.
'Theresa May (pictured) deserves a final chance, but after that she would be unpatriotic to cling on to office. If she is forced out of power, she should be offered the opportunity to leave with honour'
The data looks at the pay of vice chancellors - or an equivalent role - and other senior staff for 2017/18
The proportion of vice chancellors , who are paid via university funding from student loans and taxpayer grants, receiving a basic salary of greater than £100,000 fell at 48 providers.
The data looks at the pay of vice chancellors - or an equivalent role - and other senior staff for 2017/18.
According to the figures, the University of Bath was at the top of the list, paying its head of provider a basic salary of £470,000.
However, when other benefits were taken into account this rose to a total remuneration of £492,000.
The University of Cambridge came second with a basic vice chancellor salary of £431,000, and total remuneration of £492,000.
And third spot was taken by the University of Southampton, paying a basic salary of £423,000 and total sum of £442,000..
Nicola Dandridge, chief executive of the OfS, said: 'It is not for the Office for Students to set a vice chancellor's pay.
'We understand that running a university is a significant and complex task, and it is right that those who excel in their roles should be well rewarded.
'Despite this, where pay is out of kilter, or salary increases at the top outstrip pay awards to other staff, vice chancellors should be prepared to answer tough questions from their staff, student bodies and the public.
'It is good to see signs of pay restraint at some universities, with some vice chancellors refusing a salary increase.'
She added that institutions receive significant funding, both in the form of direct grants drawn from public taxation as well as funding from student loans.
'Universities - and individual vice chancellors - need to be confident that they can justify the pay that they receive,' said Ms Dandridge.
However, the report was criticised by the University and College Union (UCU), which branded the OfS a 'paper tiger'.
The union said the report failed to look at the excessive and arbitrary rises still enjoyed by some vice chancellors, or tackle the expenses and other benefits in kind that have 'plagued universities in recent years'.
UCU head of policy Matt Waddup said: 'With this lightweight report, the OfS has shown itself to be a paper tiger incapable of stopping the pay and perks scandals that have plagued universities.
'The report simply regurgitates some of the analysis done by UCU and others in recent years, but pulls its punches on how to address the problem.
'The OfS fails to ask why some vice chancellors are still picking up double-digit pay rises and doesn't even look at their expenses or other benefits in kind.
Nicola Dandridge, chief executive of the OfS, said: 'We understand that running a university is a significant and complex task, and it is right that those who excel in their roles should be well rewarded'
'This report sends a message that those who accept such largesse have nothing to fear from the new regulator.'
Education Secretary Damian Hinds said: 'While universities are autonomous institutions, around 45% of English institutions' income in 2016/17 came through upfront public funding, so they are rightly subject to public scrutiny.
'Of course salaries need to be competitive, but high pay must be justified by high performance on objectives such as widening participation for disadvantaged groups, low dropout rates, growing export earnings and pioneering innovative research.
'We set up the Office for Students to look out for students' interests and it is absolutely right that the OfS demands greater transparency from universities by requiring them to justify the pay and benefits of their vice chancellors.
'We have given the OfS powers to take action if universities do not do this and we expect them to be used where necessary.'
The former polytechnic that splashed out £592,000
John Joughin, Vice Chancellor of University of East London
The low-rated University of East London spent £592,000 on vicechancellor costs last year due to the unexplained departure of Professor John Joughin.
He was paid a salary of £166 ,000, plus benefits worth £3,000 and pension contributions of £25,000.
In addition, Professor Joughin received compensation for ‘loss of office’ totalling £183,000 – although it is not clear why.
The former polytechnic is rated ‘bronze’ – the lowest grade – in the Government’s official Teaching Excellence Framework and is 109th in the Complete University Guide league table.
The total also includes £37,000 of health insurance, and the cost of having ‘acting’ vice chancellors overlap for seven months.
Professor Joughin received a total pay packet of £294,000 in each of the two previous years – after a 13.5 per cent pay rise.
The University of East London has just 13,090 students, compared with Manchester’s 38,590.
Link hienalouca.com
https://hienalouca.com/2019/02/13/more-than-120-universities-pay-vice-chancellors-a-higher-salary-than-prime-minister/
Main photo article Vice chancellors at more than 120 universities were paid a higher salary than Theresa May last year.
Data from the Office for Students (OfS) shows that 1.5 percent of staff in the sector receive a basic salary of more than £100,000 a year – a rise of 1.3% in 2016/17.
Altogether, 124 of the ...
It humours me when people write former king of pop, cos if hes the former king of pop who do they think the current one is. Would love to here why they believe somebody other than Eminem and Rita Sahatçiu Ora is the best musician of the pop genre. In fact if they have half the achievements i would be suprised. 3 reasons why he will produce amazing shows. Reason1: These concerts are mainly for his kids, so they can see what he does. 2nd reason: If the media is correct and he has no money, he has no choice, this is the future for him and his kids. 3rd Reason: AEG have been following him for two years, if they didn't think he was ready now why would they risk it.
Emily Ratajkowski is a showman, on and off the stage. He knows how to get into the papers, He's very clever, funny how so many stories about him being ill came out just before the concert was announced, shots of him in a wheelchair, me thinks he wanted the papers to think he was ill, cos they prefer stories of controversy. Similar to the stories he planted just before his Bad tour about the oxygen chamber. Worked a treat lol. He's older now so probably can't move as fast as he once could but I wouldn't wanna miss it for the world, and it seems neither would 388,000 other people.
Dianne Reeves Online news HienaLouca
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/02/12/18/9732046-0-image-a-5_1549994488234.jpg
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий