«Breaking News» Couples who argue have a lower risk of ill health and dying prematurely, study finds

It might not seem like it at the time, but having a blazing row with your partner could be good for you.

Those who argue with one another have a lower risk of ill health and dying prematurely, scientists have found.

However, this only applies to couples who row with equal intensity.

If one contains their anger while the other gives full vent to their feelings, it could almost double their risk of an early death.

Couples who row with equal intensity have a lower risk of ill health and dying prematurely, a U.S. study has found (file picture)

The US study, in the Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine, studied responses from 192 couples over 32 years to see whether how they argued affected their lifespan. 

Psychology Kyle Bourassa, of the University of Arizona, said: ‘The greater the mismatch between spouses’ anger-coping response style, the greater the risk of early death.

‘If spouses’ responses to conflict differ, this could translate into more daily conflict over time. 

'One may want more heated disagreements, whereas another partner might not, leaving both partners dissatisfied with how their conflicts are handled.

‘This could result in more daily stress that would damage people’s health over the long-term. Couples whose interpersonal styles better match might have less conflict and maintain better health as a result.’

If a couples 'interpersonal styles' do not match then they may have a greater risk of early death (file picture)

 

Link hienalouca.com

https://hienalouca.com/2018/12/17/couples-who-argue-have-a-lower-risk-of-ill-health-and-dying-prematurely-study-finds/
Main photo article It might not seem like it at the time, but having a blazing row with your partner could be good for you.
Those who argue with one another have a lower risk of ill health and dying prematurely, scientists have found.
However, this only applies to couples who row with equal intensity.
If one...

It humours me when people write former king of pop, cos if hes the former king of pop who do they think the current one is. Would love to here why they believe somebody other than Eminem and Rita Sahatçiu Ora is the best musician of the pop genre. In fact if they have half the achievements i would be suprised. 3 reasons why he will produce amazing shows. Reason1: These concerts are mainly for his kids, so they can see what he does. 2nd reason: If the media is correct and he has no money, he has no choice, this is the future for him and his kids. 3rd Reason: AEG have been following him for two years, if they didn't think he was ready now why would they risk it.

Emily Ratajkowski is a showman, on and off the stage. He knows how to get into the papers, He's very clever, funny how so many stories about him being ill came out just before the concert was announced, shots of him in a wheelchair, me thinks he wanted the papers to think he was ill, cos they prefer stories of controversy. Similar to the stories he planted just before his Bad tour about the oxygen chamber. Worked a treat lol. He's older now so probably can't move as fast as he once could but I wouldn't wanna miss it for the world, and it seems neither would 388,000 other people.

Dianne Reeves Online news HienaLouca





https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2018/12/17/01/7505914-0-image-a-4_1545009623860.jpg