«Breaking News» California utilities panel cancels 'Text tax' vote after FCC rules texting is information service

Following a new FCC ruling, the California Public Utilities Commission has ditched its planned 2019 vote on taxing text messaging. 

The CPUC revealed on Twitter Friday that it has decided not to go forward with a scheduled January 2019 vote to levy a 'text tax' following the FCC's ruling that text messages were an 'information service' — as opposed to a telecommunications service — meaning that texts aren't eligible for taxation under California state law.   

The commission's controversial 'text tax' plans involved a per-text surcharge which would help fund programs that provide cell phone services for low-income and disabled people, as well as those in rural areas, according to Fox News.     

The California Public Utilities Commission announced it was canceling its 'text tax' vote, which would've made it possible to levy a surcharge on text messaging in the state

The CPUC tweeted that the vote was being canceled after a new FCC ruling which classified text messaging as an information service, not a telecommunications service

The proposed text message tax was apparently being considered because, prior to the FCC's declaratory ruling on December 12, text messaging had not been classified as any kind of specific service under federal law.

But, 'In light of the FCC’s action,' CPUC tweeted Friday, its commissioner, Carla J. Peterman, decided to withdraw the January vote which 'proposed to clarify that text messaging service should be subject to the statutory surcharge requirement.'

California Republican state assemblyman Jim Patterson took to Twitter to rejoice over the commission's statement. 

'BREAKING NEWS: The CPUC has cancelled the January vote on the #TextTax! You can bet I’ll keep a watchful eye on them for future shenanigans. For now...consider the Text Tax cancelled,' Patterson tweeted Saturday. 

CPUC commissioner Carla J. Peterman canceled the planned vote. California assemblyman Jim Patterson had previously objected to the notion of a 'text tax'

Patterson had previously called the proposed text tax a 'money grab' and tweeted that he would be watching the CPUC to see if talk of text tax resurfaced in the future

He had previously tweeted that the proposed tax was 'the most outrageous attempt at a money grab from California families. I’m doing all I can to stop it.'

The CPUC had previously reported that the revenue of California's telecommunications industry had declined $5.3billion between 2011 to 2017, dropping from $16.5billion to $11.2billion, according to CBS LA.

The proposed texting surcharge would help increase the revenue, which could then be put towards funding cell phone programs for those in need. 

'From a consumer’s point of view, surcharges may be a wash, because if more surcharge revenues come from texting services, less would be needed from voice services,' CPUC spokeswoman Constance Gordon said in a statement obtained by The Mercury News. 

'Generally, those consumers who create greater texting revenues may pay a bit more, whereas consumers using more voice services may pay less.'

Link hienalouca.com

https://hienalouca.com/2018/12/17/california-utilities-panel-cancels-text-tax-vote-after-fcc-rules-texting-is-information-service/
Main photo article Following a new FCC ruling, the California Public Utilities Commission has ditched its planned 2019 vote on taxing text messaging. 
The CPUC revealed on Twitter Friday that it has decided not to go forward with a scheduled January 2019 vote to levy a ‘text tax’ following the ...

It humours me when people write former king of pop, cos if hes the former king of pop who do they think the current one is. Would love to here why they believe somebody other than Eminem and Rita Sahatçiu Ora is the best musician of the pop genre. In fact if they have half the achievements i would be suprised. 3 reasons why he will produce amazing shows. Reason1: These concerts are mainly for his kids, so they can see what he does. 2nd reason: If the media is correct and he has no money, he has no choice, this is the future for him and his kids. 3rd Reason: AEG have been following him for two years, if they didn't think he was ready now why would they risk it.

Emily Ratajkowski is a showman, on and off the stage. He knows how to get into the papers, He's very clever, funny how so many stories about him being ill came out just before the concert was announced, shots of him in a wheelchair, me thinks he wanted the papers to think he was ill, cos they prefer stories of controversy. Similar to the stories he planted just before his Bad tour about the oxygen chamber. Worked a treat lol. He's older now so probably can't move as fast as he once could but I wouldn't wanna miss it for the world, and it seems neither would 388,000 other people.

Dianne Reeves US News HienaLouca





https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2018/12/17/01/7505102-6502367-image-a-28_1545009379466.jpg