Theresa May suffered another devastating blow last night as universities and science minister became the latest minister to resign over her Brexit deal.
Mr Gyimah was scathing of the Prime Minister's Brexit deal and said he could not support the 'naive' agreement with Brussels which was 'not in the national interest'.
The 42-year-old, who campaigned for Remain in the referendum, has left the Government hanging by a thread following a string of departures from the front bench since Mrs May announced her Brexit deal.
Mr Gyimah's departure underlines the uphill task the Prime Minister faces if she is to win the crunch vote in the Commons on the deal on December 1
Gyimah's resignation came as Theresa May was in Buenos Aires for G20 meeting
His departure underlines the uphill task the Prime Minister faces if she is to win the crunch vote in the Commons on the deal on December 11.
Writing on his Facebook page, Mr Gyimah said that if MPs were to support the agreement it would 'set ourselves up for failure' by surrendering 'our voice, our vote and our veto'.
'Britain will end up worse off, transformed from rule makers into rule takers.
'It is a democratic deficit and a loss of sovereignty the public will rightly never accept,' he said.
Mr Gyimah added that Mrs May should not rule out holding a second referendum in his resignation, or even extending the Article 50 deadline.
He said: 'The decision before us is irreversible, which is why an increasing number of MPs are demanding we explore the options from every angle. And we shouldn’t dismiss out of hand the idea of asking the people again what future they want, as we all now have a better understanding of the potential paths before us.'
The deciding factor for his resignation was the EU's continued wrangling over the Galileo satellite project, which Britain has already spent £1.2billion on.
The Prime Minister announced on Friday that Britain was pulling out of the programme and may not seek to recoup any of its huge outlay.
Speaking of the project, Gyimah said: 'As Minister with the responsibility for space technology I have seen first-hand the EU stack the deck against us time and time again, even while the ink was drying on the transition deal.
'Galileo is a clarion call that it will be "EU first", and to think otherwise – whether you are a leaver or remainer - is at best incredibly naïve.'
There are fears there could be further ministerial resignations before Parliament begins to formally debate the Withdrawal Agreement on Tuesday.
Speaking on the flight to Buenos Aires, Mrs May said: 'The EU said there was nothing else available, but what you see in the [Brexit deal] is … a more ambitious free trade agreement than Canada, that ends free movement which Norway doesn’t do. So this is the deal that is right for the UK.'
Sam Gyimah, Minister of State for Universities and Science, arrives at 10 Downing Street Cabinet meeting
Sam Gyimah's resignation letter in full
I will vote against the Government’s EU Withdrawal Agreement.
After careful consideration and reflection, I cannot support the Government’s deal and as such, I have tended my resignation as Universities and Science Minister.
I will continue to work hard for East Surrey from the backbenches and push for a deal that is right for the whole country that will help us all prosper.
See more below on this…
Galileo puts the lie to ‘best endeavours’ – Why I cannot back the Government’s Brexit proposal
The government is finally pulling out of frustrating negotiations over Galileo, the EU’s strategic Satellite Navigation system. The PM is right to call time on a negotiation that was stacked against us from the very beginning. But Galileo is only a foretaste of what’s to come under the Government’s Brexit deal.
Having surrendered our voice, our vote and our veto, we will have to rely on the ‘best endeavours’ of the EU to strike a final agreement that works in our national interest. As Minister with the responsibility for space technology I have seen first-hand the EU stack the deck against us time and time again, even while the ink was drying on the transition deal. Galileo is a clarion call that it will be ‘EU first’, and to think otherwise – whether you are a leaver or remainer - is at best incredibly naïve.
To be fair, the Government’s Brexit deal has been hard won. But at its heart, all the big decisions in the Political Declaration that will shape our future in Europe, and the world, are yet to be agreed. Where we set the balance between an independent trade policy and frictionless trade, high market access and freedom of movement, fisheries, agriculture, and the all-important Northern Ireland question are just some of the big issues still in play. It is a deal in name only. And we will be relying on the good faith of the EU to deliver the bespoke deal we have been led to expect.
There is a mountain to climb, and we are still in the foothills. Under the deal we will have only two, at most four, years to agree at least five times what has been settled to date. With so much left to negotiate, we must take a clear-eyed view on the strength of our position. So far, the EU has been able to set the timetable, the sequencing and the hurdles to be cleared at each stage of Brexit, limiting our room for manoeuvre. They have the luxury of time - we need to conclude a deal because the Northern Ireland backstop is our existential issue, not theirs. And the clock is ticking to the next General Election. All of this points to an off-the-shelf deal dictated by the EU that will be materially worse for my constituents in East Surrey than staying in.
In these protracted negotiations our interests will be repeatedly and permanently hammered by the EU27 for many years to come. Britain will end up worse off, transformed from rule makers into rule takers. At the end of these negotiations, Britain will not be standing side-by-side with our European partners as equals. Even in programmes where we have agreement, we will be outside the room when key decisions affecting our future and prosperity are made. It is a democratic deficit and a loss of sovereignty the public will rightly never accept.
These negotiations are as much about our future trading relationship with Europe as they are about our security, foreign policy and power and influence in the world. We are an island nation, and for the last 350 years have managed all aspects of our relationship with our immediate neighbours to meet our need to have a preeminent place in Europe. While we must be mindful of giving business the certainty they need, we must ensure the constitutional treaty we end up with stands the test of time.
So, what is being presented to the public as a sensible compromise Brexit deal, a 52/48 Brexit as some call it, will not bring closure or heal the divisions of Brexit. In the fullness of time, the public will wake up to what this so-called deal entails; neither leave nor remain voters will be pleased with a deal that leaves us poorer, less secure and weaker in the pursuit of our national interests.
What is the alternative, I hear people say? Sometimes it seems our horizons have been narrowed and our expectations lowered to the point where potentially crippling ourselves politically and economically for decades to come is seen as a success we should welcome.
There are alternatives that we have ruled out through our own red lines that need to be considered seriously. Even if this means extending the Article 50 deadline. The decision before us is irreversible, which is why an increasing number of MPs are demanding we explore the options from every angle. And we shouldn’t dismiss out of hand the idea of asking the people again what future they want, as we all now have a better understanding of the potential paths before us.
I voted remain, but at all times since the referendum I have endeavoured to reflect the fact that before we are remainers or leavers, we are British.
The results in my constituency were in line with the national vote; over the last few weeks I have received hundreds of emails and phones calls from constituents on the deal, the overwhelming majority urging me to vote against it. It has become increasingly clear to me that the proposed deal is not in the British national interest, and that to vote for this deal is to set ourselves up for failure.
We will be losing, not taking control of our national destiny.It was therefore with deep regret that I have tendered my resignation as the Universities, Science, Research and Innovation Minister – certainly one of the best jobs in government. Innovation, scientific endeavour and our universities represent the best of Britain, underpin our economic fortunes and are central to our place in the world.
It has been a pleasure and honour to serve these extraordinary communities.The grit and determination demonstrated by the Prime Minister should be an inspiration to us all. I am saddened, as an early and vocal backer of her leadership, to have reached a cross-roads where I cannot support her on this crucial issue.
Sam Gyimah
Member of Parliament for Surrey East
hienalouca.com
https://hienalouca.com/2018/12/01/minister-sam-gyimah-quits-over-theresa-mays-naive-brexit-deal/
Main photo article Theresa May suffered another devastating blow last night as universities and science minister became the latest minister to resign over her Brexit deal.
Mr Gyimah was scathing of the Prime Minister’s Brexit deal and said he could not support the ‘naive’ agreement with Brussels w... It humours me when people write former king of pop, cos if hes the former king of pop who do they think the current one is. Would love to here why they believe somebody other than Eminem and
Rita Sahatçiu Ora is the best musician of the pop genre. In fact if they have half the achievements i would be suprised. 3 reasons why he will produce amazing shows. Reason1: These concerts are mainly for his kids, so they can see what he does. 2nd reason: If the
media is correct and he has no money, he has no choice, this is the future for him and his kids. 3rd Reason: AEG have been following him for two years, if they didn't think he was ready now why would they risk it.
Emily Ratajkowski is a showman, on and off the stage. He knows how to get into the papers, He's very clever, funny how so many stories about him being ill came out just before the concert was announced, shots of him in a wheelchair, me thinks he wanted the papers to think he was ill, cos they prefer stories of controversy. Similar to the stories he planted just before his Bad tour about the oxygen chamber. Worked a treat lol. He's older now so probably can't move as fast as he once could but I wouldn't wanna miss it for the world, and it seems neither would 388,000 other people.
Dianne Reeves Online news HienaLouca
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2018/11/30/23/6862684-0-image-m-16_1543618846486.jpg
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий