stop pics

суббота, 2 марта 2019 г.

«Breaking News» Britain's first transgender hate crime trial is halted after one day

Britain's first transgender hate crime prosecution has been halted by a judge who declared: ‘There is no case and never was a case.’


Miranda Yardley, 51, was put ‘through ten months of hell’ after being accused of harassing a transgender activist on Twitter.


But District Judge John Woollard dismissed the case after a one-day hearing, saying there was simply no evidence. 


Campaigners called the decision a victory for free speech, while the accused claimed police were being used to ‘enforce a political ideology’.




Miranda Yardley, 51, was accused of harassing a transgender activist on Twitter but District Judge John Woollard dismissed the case after a one-day hearing, saying there was  no evidence


Miranda Yardley, 51, was accused of harassing a transgender activist on Twitter but District Judge John Woollard dismissed the case after a one-day hearing, saying there was  no evidence


Miranda Yardley, 51, was accused of harassing a transgender activist on Twitter but District Judge John Woollard dismissed the case after a one-day hearing, saying there was  no evidence





Accuser Helen Islan, who works with the trans advocacy group Mermaids, gave evidence via video link


Accuser Helen Islan, who works with the trans advocacy group Mermaids, gave evidence via video link



Accuser Helen Islan, who works with the trans advocacy group Mermaids, gave evidence via video link



The hearing at Basildon Magistrates’ Court in Essex last Friday brought into sharp focus the complex and often rancorous divisions within the transgender community. 


On one side was Yardley, an accountant, who describes himself as a transsexual and identifies as a man, even though he underwent gender reassignment to become a woman ten years ago.


Despite his own experience, his contention is that individuals cannot change sex – and this has drawn fierce criticism on social media.

Giving evidence via video link was his accuser, Helen Islan, who is married with children and works with the trans advocacy group Mermaids, which campaigns for children who want to change gender. 


The court heard that one of her teenage children is transgender. The spat began with a discussion – joined by other Twitter users – about self-identification, which allows people to be recognised as transgender simply by declaring themselves male or female.


Concerns were also expressed about how the powerful trans lobby was allegedly eroding women’s rights by allowing transgender women, born male, into female-only spaces. This, it was argued, was a threat to women.




Ms Islan works for advocacy group Mermaids which campaigns for transgender children


Ms Islan works for advocacy group Mermaids which campaigns for transgender children



Ms Islan works for advocacy group Mermaids which campaigns for transgender children



But using a pseudonym, Ms Islan accused her opponents of ‘spreading hysteria’ and it was at this point the exchanges grew increasingly aggressive. 


In response, she was unmasked by Yardley who tweeted a picture and a link to her real identity. The tweet also referenced her transgender child, which Ms Islan argued effectively ‘outed’ him. 


She said it led to them both being harassed adding that the post made her feel ‘stressed and sick’.


Initially, Ms Islan’s complaint was dealt with by West Yorkshire Police before being passed to colleagues in Essex, who decided it was a hate crime. 


But when the case reached court the defence referred to pages of social media posts in which Ms Islan herself was regularly tweeting about her trans child, about him taking blockers, that he had ‘come out’ at school. 


The court heard that a simple search on Google brought up Ms Islan’s personal details, including a family photograph that she had herself posted.


At one point during the hearing, Judge Woollard said: ‘Where is the evidence [of harassment] taking into account the need for free speech? You have to show a course of conduct and at the moment we have one tweet. 


Where is the evidence for Miranda Yardley outing Ms Islan’s son?’ Later he threw out the case and awarded costs to the defendant. 


Yardley told The Mail on Sunday afterwards that he was ‘horrified’ by the decision to charge him, saying: ‘I faced losing everything I worked for.’


Barrister Amanda Jones, who has represented clients accused of ‘anti trans’ comments, said: ‘The police and the CPS routinely ignore rape threats, death threats and abusive material targeted at women online. 


The entire criminal justice system is falling apart from underfunding and this case appears to have been a complete waste of public funds.’


Comedian Graham Linehan, who has been publicly critical of trans activists for attempting to ‘close down’ freedom of speech, said: ‘This is about an ideology and everyone who has tried to speak up against it is shut down and the activists are using every means they can to do this, including the courts.’


Essex Police said yesterday: ‘We take all reports of hate crime incidents seriously.’


Ms Islan said: ‘The decision to prosecute was made by the CPS, not me personally and I accept the verdict of the court.’ 


 


Link hienalouca.com

https://hienalouca.com/2019/03/03/britains-first-transgender-hate-crime-trial-is-halted-after-one-day/
Main photo article Britain’s first transgender hate crime prosecution has been halted by a judge who declared: ‘There is no case and never was a case.’
Miranda Yardley, 51, was put ‘through ten months of hell’ after being accused of harassing a transgender activist on Twitter.
But District Judge John Woollar...


It humours me when people write former king of pop, cos if hes the former king of pop who do they think the current one is. Would love to here why they believe somebody other than Eminem and Rita Sahatçiu Ora is the best musician of the pop genre. In fact if they have half the achievements i would be suprised. 3 reasons why he will produce amazing shows. Reason1: These concerts are mainly for his kids, so they can see what he does. 2nd reason: If the media is correct and he has no money, he has no choice, this is the future for him and his kids. 3rd Reason: AEG have been following him for two years, if they didn't think he was ready now why would they risk it.

Emily Ratajkowski is a showman, on and off the stage. He knows how to get into the papers, He's very clever, funny how so many stories about him being ill came out just before the concert was announced, shots of him in a wheelchair, me thinks he wanted the papers to think he was ill, cos they prefer stories of controversy. Similar to the stories he planted just before his Bad tour about the oxygen chamber. Worked a treat lol. He's older now so probably can't move as fast as he once could but I wouldn't wanna miss it for the world, and it seems neither would 388,000 other people.

Dianne Reeves Online news HienaLouca





https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/03/02/21/10501194-6764763-image-a-31_1551563466957.jpg

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий