stop pics

суббота, 2 марта 2019 г.

«Breaking News» PETER HITCHENS: Conservative values? Now that means forcing your children into sex lessons 

Revolutionaries love to indoctrinate children. You can look up yourself who said these words: 'When an opponent declares, 'I will not come over to your side', I calmly say, 'Your child belongs to us already… What are you? You will pass on. 


Your descendants, however, now stand in the new camp. In a short time they will know nothing else but this new community.' '


But it does not really matter who it was. It is horribly true, and it is what all these meddlers think and why they are all so keen on getting control of schools and youth movements.




Revolutionaries love to indoctrinate children. You can look up yourself who said these words: 'When an opponent declares, 'I will not come over to your side'


Revolutionaries love to indoctrinate children. You can look up yourself who said these words: 'When an opponent declares, 'I will not come over to your side'



Revolutionaries love to indoctrinate children. You can look up yourself who said these words: 'When an opponent declares, 'I will not come over to your side'



This week, they took a great step towards their goal, which is the eradication of all that is left of conservative Christian opinion in this country.


Some of you will be astonished (I am not) that it was a nominally Conservative government which last week announced the extension of compulsory 'relationship' education and 'sex education' throughout the school system.

Of course, in our innocence-free society, there is nobody over the age of about seven who does not know how babies are made. This 'education' will be about what to think, not what to do. 


If you can ever get your own children's schools to disgorge the material they are using, you will find that it will cover the whole broad front of sexual liberation from condoms to sex-changes.




If you can ever get your own children's schools to disgorge the material they are using, you will find that it will cover the whole broad front of sexual liberation from condoms to sex-changes


If you can ever get your own children's schools to disgorge the material they are using, you will find that it will cover the whole broad front of sexual liberation from condoms to sex-changes



If you can ever get your own children's schools to disgorge the material they are using, you will find that it will cover the whole broad front of sexual liberation from condoms to sex-changes



Many beliefs will become unsayable, and so unthinkable. It is already the case, for instance, that you will be greeted with shock and anger in most schools if you say that marriage is between a man and a woman, and that it is better than alternative forms of family.


If you are wise, you will not risk saying any such thing. Here's a small illustration of how much narrower the range of permitted speech is than it used to be. It is now 20 years since Channel Four launched its TV drama series Queer As Folk, in which the main characters were homosexuals.


I was asked to watch it, and to comment on it on a TV programme, and said that it was cultural propaganda, intended to persuade viewers that homosexuality was normal behaviour. 




It is now 20 years since Channel Four launched its TV drama series Queer As Folk, in which the main characters were homosexuals


It is now 20 years since Channel Four launched its TV drama series Queer As Folk, in which the main characters were homosexuals



It is now 20 years since Channel Four launched its TV drama series Queer As Folk, in which the main characters were homosexuals



This sounds about right to me. That's what it was. But the Left-wing commentators who have dug this out of the archives expect present-day readers to be shocked that anyone ever had the nerve to say any such thing.


If I live another 20 years, the fact that I ever dared to say and think this will certainly be used to try to keep me off the internet, and quite possibly to prosecute me. If you think I am joking, stick around.


The Times columnist Janice Turner, miles to the Left of me, is already feeling the cold breath of the thought police on her neck, for bravely resisting conformism on the transgender issue. 


This will happen because of this compulsory indoctrination in school, approved by a man called Damian Hinds, of whom almost nothing interesting is known, who has somehow become Secretary of State for Education.


Mr Hinds has openly broken a clear pledge given two years ago by a Tory government.




This will happen because of this compulsory indoctrination in school, approved by a man called Damian Hinds


This will happen because of this compulsory indoctrination in school, approved by a man called Damian Hinds



This will happen because of this compulsory indoctrination in school, approved by a man called Damian Hinds



The genuinely conservative MP Edward Leigh asked him a quietly devastating question in Parliament: 'All previous Conservative Governments… have given an untrammelled right to parents to remove their children from sex education but here, in certain circumstances, that right has been transferred to the head teacher – a fundamental shift of power to the State.'


'How does that square with what Edward Timpson, the then Minister for Vulnerable Children and Families, said during the passage of the Children and Social Work Bill? 


He said, 'We have committed to retain a right to withdraw from sex education in RSE, because parents should have the right, if they wish, to teach sex education themselves in a way that is consistent with their values.' '


Mr Hinds did not answer it. So another Tory MP who doesn't toe the line, Julian Lewis, pressed the point: 'He keeps adding the words, 'unless there are exceptional circumstances'. 


Why have those words been added? In what circumstances would a head teacher overrule a parent? Is not the likely effect of this going to be that in some cases, instead of children getting necessary sex education in schools, more parents are going to keep their children out of school?'




The genuinely conservative MP Edward Leigh asked Hinds a quietly devastating question in Parliament


The genuinely conservative MP Edward Leigh asked Hinds a quietly devastating question in Parliament



The genuinely conservative MP Edward Leigh asked Hinds a quietly devastating question in Parliament



Mr Hinds avoided that, too. The law now sides with the State against the parent, and that is that.


And this was the moment at which a vital freedom died. The 1980 prophecy of that appalling fanatic Lady Helen Brook 'From birth till death it is now the privilege of the parental State to take major decisions – objective, unemotional, the State weighs up what is best for the child' has now come true, and under a Tory government propped up by supposedly ultra-conservative Ulstermen.


I quite understand why people don't fancy having Jeremy Corbyn as Prime Minister. But if this sort of Trotskyist cultural revolution carries on while the Tories are in office, I am not sure it will make all that much difference.



The government provided a useless response to the petittion thousands signed, asking for an inquiry into the apparent link between marijuana and violence


The government provided a useless response to the petittion thousands signed, asking for an inquiry into the apparent link between marijuana and violence



The government provided a useless response to the petittion thousands signed, asking for an inquiry into the apparent link between marijuana and violence



 The Government has now provided its entirely useless response to the petition which thousands of you so kindly signed, asking for an inquiry into the apparent link between marijuana and violence.


 It appears to have been written by a computer, wholly unaware of the fact that the police have stopped enforcing the drug laws. Even so, some good has been done. When the crisis is so bad and bloody that even Ministers can see it, they won’t be able to pretend that they weren’t warned.

Final proof that 'justice' is now just a hollow illusion


I hope that the MP Fiona Onasanya will soon turn up in the House of Commons wearing an electronic tag. 




I hope that the MP Fiona Onasanya will soon turn up in the House of Commons wearing an electronic tag


I hope that the MP Fiona Onasanya will soon turn up in the House of Commons wearing an electronic tag



I hope that the MP Fiona Onasanya will soon turn up in the House of Commons wearing an electronic tag



This is because it will be educational for all the other MPs, who will then find out what everyone else has known for years – that our criminal justice system is made of cardboard.


I don’t really care all that much about Ms Onasanya, left. I’m even prepared to accept that she may be innocent (as she says she is) of the charge of which she was convicted, perverting the course of justice. 


But the facts are these. She was sentenced to three months in prison for what many would see as a very serious offence. And she was out after 28 days.


Prison sentences, even when they are imposed, are more or less fictional. And the really odd thing is that it is precisely this weakness which persuades so many people that they, too, will get away with crime. 


And so they break the law, in such numbers that even our absent police and feeble courts have to catch and imprison some of them. 


And that is why the prisons are so full. And that is why the sentences are so short and why prisoners are let out so quickly. Which is why… well, it reminds me of that old song There’s A Hole In My Bucket.

Is greedy Oxbridge selling its soul?


Did you know that Oxford University sometimes interviews would-be overseas students by telephone? Nor did I. I thought a gruelling face- to-face meeting was unavoidable. 


I am fascinated by news that the number of UK students at Oxbridge is falling, while the number of foreign undergraduates is up. 


I am assured, however, that there is no connection between this development and the fact that non-EU students pay fees of up to £30,000 a year while tuition fees are capped at £9,250 a year for British and EU students. 


It is good to know our great institutions are not influenced by the money-making frenzy which seems to have so many of our universities in its grip. 


Link hienalouca.com

https://hienalouca.com/2019/03/03/peter-hitchens-conservative-values-now-that-means-forcing-your-children-into-sex-lessons/
Main photo article Revolutionaries love to indoctrinate children. You can look up yourself who said these words: ‘When an opponent declares, ‘I will not come over to your side’, I calmly say, ‘Your child belongs to us already… What are you? You will pass on. 
Your descendants, however, now s...


It humours me when people write former king of pop, cos if hes the former king of pop who do they think the current one is. Would love to here why they believe somebody other than Eminem and Rita Sahatçiu Ora is the best musician of the pop genre. In fact if they have half the achievements i would be suprised. 3 reasons why he will produce amazing shows. Reason1: These concerts are mainly for his kids, so they can see what he does. 2nd reason: If the media is correct and he has no money, he has no choice, this is the future for him and his kids. 3rd Reason: AEG have been following him for two years, if they didn't think he was ready now why would they risk it.

Emily Ratajkowski is a showman, on and off the stage. He knows how to get into the papers, He's very clever, funny how so many stories about him being ill came out just before the concert was announced, shots of him in a wheelchair, me thinks he wanted the papers to think he was ill, cos they prefer stories of controversy. Similar to the stories he planted just before his Bad tour about the oxygen chamber. Worked a treat lol. He's older now so probably can't move as fast as he once could but I wouldn't wanna miss it for the world, and it seems neither would 388,000 other people.

Dianne Reeves Online news HienaLouca





https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/03/03/01/10505920-0-image-a-1_1551576213241.jpg

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий