stop pics

пятница, 8 марта 2019 г.

«Breaking News» In-N-Out Burger suing Puma for Drive Thru sneakers

In-N-Out-Burger is suing Puma, accusing the latest Sportstyle releases of copying the California fast food chain's designs and trade dress.


The West Coast restaurant brand founded October 1948 - the same year as Germany's Puma – claims the new collaboration with Chinatown Market founder Mike Cherman 'intentionally confused consumers for their own benefit'.


Puma's white leather Cali-0 Drive Thru CC shoe features two red stripes along the side, with the same color for the brand name on the sock liner and side of the sneaker.


Scroll down for video 





In-N-Out Burger is suing Puma for copying 'designs and trade dress' with its Drive Thru shoes


In-N-Out Burger is suing Puma for copying 'designs and trade dress' with its Drive Thru shoes






In-N-Out Burger's white, red and yellow branding


In-N-Out Burger's white, red and yellow branding



In-N-Out Burger is suing Puma for copying 'designs and trade dress' with its Drive Thru shoes





The fast food chain features crossed palm trees outside most outlets in its California home


The fast food chain features crossed palm trees outside most outlets in its California home



The fast food chain features crossed palm trees outside most outlets in its California home






Puma's white leather Cali-0 Drive Thru CC shoe features two red stripes along the side


Puma's white leather Cali-0 Drive Thru CC shoe features two red stripes along the side






It uses the same color for the brand name on the sock liner and side of the sneaker


It uses the same color for the brand name on the sock liner and side of the sneaker



Puma's white leather Cali-0 Drive Thru CC shoe features two red stripes along the side, with the same color for the brand name on the sock liner and side of the sneaker



Yellow accents appear above the heel and the tongue of the item which costs $110.


Some images show the shoe with palm tree prints on the laces. Most In-N-Out locations have a pair of crossed palm trees outside.


Founder Harry Snyder is said to have been inspired by movie It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World where characters hunt for treasure under W-shaped palm trees.


The palm trees also appear on packaging and merchandise such as cups and socks.




Promotional video on social media shows the Cali-0 Drive Thru CC in a setting similar to fast food production line


Promotional video on social media shows the Cali-0 Drive Thru CC in a setting similar to fast food production line



Promotional video on social media shows the Cali-0 Drive Thru CC in a setting similar to fast food production line





Here the Cali shoe is seen on Instagram with mustard being squirted underneath


Here the Cali shoe is seen on Instagram with mustard being squirted underneath



Here the Cali shoe is seen on Instagram with mustard being squirted underneath


In-N-Out Burger executive vice president, Arnie Wensinger, told NBC4 in a statement that Puma and California designer and lawsuit co-defendant Cherman 'created the impression that our marks and unique trade dress are available for public use'.


The brand has its own California Dreamin' shoes on sale for $49.95 in its online shop.


However doesn't use the white, red and yellow hues from its other items on the sunsets and palm trees design. 


In a video posted on the Puma's Instagram page in February, the Cali-0 Drive Thru CC shoe appears with plain white laces. 




Laces on the Cali-0 Drive Thru CC shoes feature palm trees


Laces on the Cali-0 Drive Thru CC shoes feature palm trees






Palm trees appear on In-N-Out Burger's merchandise


Palm trees appear on In-N-Out Burger's merchandise



Laces on the Cali-0 Drive Thru CC shoes feature palm trees like on In-N-Out Burger's merchandise





In-N-Out Burger executive vice president, Arnie Wensinger, said in a statement that Puma and California designer and lawsuit co-defendant Mike Cherman 'created the impression that our marks and unique trade dress are available for public use'


In-N-Out Burger executive vice president, Arnie Wensinger, said in a statement that Puma and California designer and lawsuit co-defendant Mike Cherman 'created the impression that our marks and unique trade dress are available for public use'



In-N-Out Burger executive vice president, Arnie Wensinger, said in a statement that Puma and California designer and lawsuit co-defendant Mike Cherman 'created the impression that our marks and unique trade dress are available for public use'



A second pair of sneakers released, similarly named the California Drive-Thru shoes, sells for $90 and doesn't feature the double thin strips above the sole or the yellow accent on the sock liner.


While these are on sale on Puma's website, the Cali-0 Drive Thru CC is not.


The lawsuit was filed last Friday. 


A Puma representative told DailyMail.com the brand does not comment on ongoing court cases.





California Drive-Thru shoes


California Drive-Thru shoes






The $90 sneakers are still available on Puma's website


The $90 sneakers are still available on Puma's website



A second pair of sneakers released, similarly named the California Drive-Thru shoes, sells for $90 and is still available on Puma's website 





In-N-Out Burger has its own California Dreamin' shoes on sale for $49.95 in its online shop


In-N-Out Burger has its own California Dreamin' shoes on sale for $49.95 in its online shop



In-N-Out Burger has its own California Dreamin' shoes on sale for $49.95 in its online shop



Link hienalouca.com

https://hienalouca.com/2019/03/08/in-n-out-burger-suing-puma-for-drive-thru-sneakers/
Main photo article In-N-Out-Burger is suing Puma, accusing the latest Sportstyle releases of copying the California fast food chain’s designs and trade dress.
The West Coast restaurant brand founded October 1948 – the same year as Germany‘s Puma – claims the new collaboration with Chinatown M...


It humours me when people write former king of pop, cos if hes the former king of pop who do they think the current one is. Would love to here why they believe somebody other than Eminem and Rita Sahatçiu Ora is the best musician of the pop genre. In fact if they have half the achievements i would be suprised. 3 reasons why he will produce amazing shows. Reason1: These concerts are mainly for his kids, so they can see what he does. 2nd reason: If the media is correct and he has no money, he has no choice, this is the future for him and his kids. 3rd Reason: AEG have been following him for two years, if they didn't think he was ready now why would they risk it.

Emily Ratajkowski is a showman, on and off the stage. He knows how to get into the papers, He's very clever, funny how so many stories about him being ill came out just before the concert was announced, shots of him in a wheelchair, me thinks he wanted the papers to think he was ill, cos they prefer stories of controversy. Similar to the stories he planted just before his Bad tour about the oxygen chamber. Worked a treat lol. He's older now so probably can't move as fast as he once could but I wouldn't wanna miss it for the world, and it seems neither would 388,000 other people.

Dianne Reeves US News HienaLouca





https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/03/08/14/10743814-6786563-image-a-31_1552055531948.jpg

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий