«Breaking News» Brexit hardliners BACK Bercow's sabotage of May's deal

Theresa May was preparing to take on John Bercow today after the Commons Speaker detonated a bombshell under her plans for the Brexit endgame.

Mrs May's Brexit Secretary hinted the Government could bring back its deal within days anyway and dare Mr Bercow to rule it out of order if and when the PM has secured a delay to Brexit. The Cabinet will discuss the crisis in No 10 this morning.

Downing Street has reacted with fury to Mr Bercow's insistence it cannot put an unchanged deal to a third vote and Mr Barclay accused Mr Bercow of 'raising the bar' for a deal with the EU today. 

The Speaker refused to comment on his decision when greeted by reporters outside Parliament this morning. 

But Brexit hardliners have backed the explosive ruling that has left Prime Minister's plans lying in tatters today.

Members of the European Research Group led by Jacob Rees-Mogg seized on the Commons Speaker's intervention as they fight to secure No Deal Brexit on March 29 next week.

MPs on the group were heard whistling the 'Great Escape' theme tune in the Commons tea room last night in the belief Mr Bercow's bombshell makes their hopes of No Deal more likely. 

They also hope a long delay - instead of a short extension to implement this deal - would allow them to dictate the terms of Brexit. 

Former Cabinet minister David Jones said the ruling was 'absolutely accurate' and insisted it was a 'well known' rule - adding Mr Bercow was doing the 'right thing'. 

Mrs May will fly to Brussels on Thursday for a tense EU summit at which she will admit Brexit must be delayed.

She had hoped to go having secured support for her battered deal at the third attempt and ask only for a short technical extension of around three months.

Instead she will beg for a much longer delay despite little clarity over what Britain might do with months or years more time.

As Mrs May's prepares her mission, the Foreign Office revealed its No Deal 'war room' today with just 11 days until Britain was supposed to leave the EU.

Brexit hardliners backed John Bercow's (pictured today outside Parliament) ruling Theresa May cannot bring her deal back unchanged for a third time as the Prime Minister's plans lay in tatters today

Mrs May will fly to Brussels on Thursday for a tense EU summit at which she will admit Brexit must be delayed. She had hoped to go having secured support for her battered deal at the third attempt and ask only for a short technical extension of around three months

Brexiteer David Jones (file left) endorsed the Speaker's decision today despite Brexit Secretary Stephen Barclay (right in Downing Street today) insisting the Government still wanted to pass the deal 

Mr Jones told the Today programme: 'John Bercow's ruling was absolutely accurate. It has been well known that it's impossible for a Speaker to allow a series of identical motions to be put before the House in the same session.

Why is John Bercow a controversial Speaker?

A 'Boll**** to Brexit' sticker can be clearly seen in photographs of Mr Bercow's black 4x4, which has a personalised numberplate

Brexit bias: John Bercow has revealed publicly that he voted for Remain in 2016, fuelling claims by Brexiteers he is trying to frustrate Brexit in the Commons.

The claims were fuelled by an anti-Brexit sticker being spotted in a black Land Rover parked outside Mr Bercow's Commons home - he has insisted the car and sticker belongs to his wife.

Brexiteers were furious last week when he refused to accept an amendment that sought to rule out a second referendum on Brexit. 

It added to complaints through much of the two-and-a-half years since the referendum that he has sought to boost pro-EU supporters such as Dominic Grieve and Ken Clarke at the expense of Brexiteers.  

Bullying claims: John Bercow has been hit by a number of bullying claims. He is said to have subjected staff to angry outbursts for years, mocking junior officials and leaving staff 'terrified'.

A former private secretary Kate Emms has said she was left with PTSD after working for him.

Mr Bercow denies all the allegations.  

His wife Sally: Sally Bercow has courted controversy since her husband was first elected. She infamously posed in a sheet for a magazine interview soon after Mr Bercow was first elected and she took part in Celebrity Big Brother.

A public Labour supporter, Mrs Bercow's political views led to claims she undermined the Speaker's independence.

In 2015 it emerged Sally had an affair with Mr Bercow's cousin Alan - even leading the couple to move into the family home in Battersea while the Speaker stayed in his grace-and-favour apartment in Parliament.

Expenses: Mr Bercow faced persistent criticism of his official expenses, which have included lavish bills for chauffeur-driven cars, trips abroad and entertaining foreign dignitaries.

Mr Bercow and his family live rent-free in an opulent apartment at parliament, where the taxpayer foots a £109 a month bill for the Arsenal fan's Sky subscription.

Bias against the Tories: Conservative ministers and MPs have long-complained Mr Bercow favours Labour. He repeatedly hauls ministers to the Commons to answer Urgent Questions and Emergency Debates - far more often than has historically been the case.

He frequently reprimands ministers, often sarcastically, and his behaviour prompted the Cameron Government to launch a near-unprecedented attempt to remove him in 2015. 

Mr Bercow provoked further fury by speaking out against Donald Trump and Brexit in defiance of protocol demanding he be impartial.  

'There is nothing new about this and those who are crying foul are really wrong.

'He did the right thing.' 

Mr Jones - a senior ERG MP and supporter of No Deal - insisted the legal position was unchanged and Britain was still due to leave the EU next Friday. 

He said: 'For us not to leave on Friday next week, the law would have to be changed.'  

In a signal of the Government gearing up for a battle with the Speaker, Mr Barclay struck a defiant tone today. 

He told Sky News: 'What we need to do is secure the deal.

'What the Speaker has said in his ruling is there needs to be something that is different.

'You can have the same motion but where the circumstances have changed.

'Obviously that has a difference in terms of how Members of Parliament would vote on a particular motion.

'So we need to look at the details of the ruling, we need to consider that in the terms of earlier rulings that don't particularly align with yesterday's.

'That the fact that a number of Members of Parliament have said that they will change their votes points to the fact that there are things that are different.' 

The Speaker detonated Mrs May's plans in a short notice statement at 3.30pm yesterday - without warning No 10 in advance.  

Mr Bercow told the Commons: 'If the Government wishes to bring forward a new proposition that is neither the same or substantially the same as that disposed of by the House on March 12, that would be entirely in order.

'What the Government cannot legitimately do is resubmit to the House the same proposition or substantially the same proposition that was rejected by 149 votes'. 

Asked if he was worried about the ramifications of his decision he added: 'I've never lost a wink of sleep over anything work related'.  

Mr Bercow invoked a precedent from April 1604 - used 12 times in the Commons since then - to warn the PM that she must significantly change her deal if she wants to force another vote on it before the scheduled exit day on March 29. 

The Speaker cited page 397 of the Commons rulebook, Erskine May - and insisted today's ruling 'should not be regarded as my last word on the subject.'

Mr Bercow told MPs: 'One of the reasons the rule has lasted so long it is a necessary rule to ensure the sensible use of the House's time and proper respect for the decisions which it takes.

Foreign Office chief Sir Simon McDonald revealed his officials were stepping up their Brexit preparations with 11 days until exit 

How could May escape Bercow's trap?  

The Government is scrambling to find a way to escape the John Bercow bombshell on the Brexit deal. These are possible options: 

Paving Motion

The Government could table a separate motion spelling out explictly MPs should get a third vote on the deal. It will only work if there are votes to pass the deal - which looks unlikely.

Change the law to scrap the meaningful vote

Laws to implement the deal could scrap the requirement to have an approval vote at all. This also looks unlikely as MPs defeated the Government to force the vote in the first place.

Suspending standing orders 

The Commons controls its own rule book so a Government motion could suspend the rules invoked by the Speaker - but the Government would still need to win a vote for this to work.

End the session and hold a Queen's Speech 

The nuclear option would be to dump the current session of Parliament early and hold a quick fire State Opening. Normally this means the Queen coming to Westminster - but it is not compulsory.

It would be hard in the time available and would mean scrapping huge amounts of unfinished laws - and the Government would still need to win votes on a new Queen's Speech after.  

'Rulings of the House matter. They have weight.

'In many cases, they have direct effect not only here but on the lives of our constituents.'

A senior Government source last night said the Speaker, who is an outspoken critic of Brexit, wanted to wreck Mrs May's plan of limiting the delay to three months.

'It seems clear that the Speaker's motive here is to rule out a meaningful vote this week,' the source added. 'It leads you to believe what he really wants is a longer extension, where Parliament will take over the process and force a softer form of Brexit.

'Anyone who thinks that this makes No Deal more likely is mistaken – the Speaker wouldn't have done it if it did.'

In other developments today, Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn will meet leaders of the SNP, Liberal Democrats, Plaid Cymru and Green Party to discuss Brexit and how to end the current impasse.

In a joint statement ahead of the talks, Ian Blackford, Vince Cable, Liz Saville Roberts and Caroline Lucas said: 'The UK faces an unprecedented crisis with Brexit, and Westminster remains deeply divided.

'The best and most democratic way forward is to put the decision back to the people in a new vote - with the option to Remain on the ballot paper.'

Mr Corbyn will also meet members of the 'Norway Plus' group of MPs in a separate meeting on Tuesday.

The group is determined to force a soft Brexit through to end the current impasse.

Meanwhile in Dublin, European Council president Donald Tusk will hold talks with Irish premier Leo Varadkar.

So what DOES Speaker Bercow's shock move mean for Brexit?

Q&A by Ian Drury 

What happened yesterday?

Commons Speaker John Bercow announced, without warning, that MPs could not vote on the Prime Minister's withdrawal agreement for a third time unless it was 'substantially different' from before.

Downing Street was stunned, insisting it had no notice that the statement was coming.

Mr Bercow might argue he is behaving honourably. But at a time of national crisis, when the Government is trying to pick a way through the impasse, his intervention will be seen by ministers as profoundly unhelpful. The EU has already said it will not re-open the deal to provide the kind of changes that would satisfy the Speaker.

What had been the Prime Minister's plan?

After two humiliating Commons defeats for her Brexit deal – one by a record 230 votes in January, the second by 149 last week – Theresa May wanted to bring her agreement back for approval by MPs for a third time before March 29.

Ministers had pencilled in today or tomorrow to hold the vote ahead of the next meeting of EU leaders in Brussels on Thursday. Westminster watchers dubbed this 'Meaningful Vote Three' (MV3). Mrs May had hoped enough hardline Tory Brexiteers would hold their noses and support her deal, fearing the alternatives: a long delay to leaving the EU, a soft Brexit or, worst, no Brexit at all.

How can the Speaker justify his move?

Having been asked by Labour MPs Angela Eagle and Chris Bryant whether the Government was allowed to vote on the same motion repeatedly in a short space of time, the Speaker said he had consulted Erskine May, the Parliamentary procedural handbook. He cited a 415-year-old precedent – not used for nearly 100 years – to rule the PM could not bring back broadly the same deal 'during that same [Parliamentary] session'.

But didn't he flout parliamentary convention himself?

He did indeed. In January, Mr Bercow tore up centuries of Commons procedure and helped frustrate Mrs May's attempts to win a better deal from the EU.

He allowed an amendment by the former attorney general and Remain campaigner Dominic Grieve that forced the PM to come back within three sitting days if her withdrawal agreement was voted down.

This ruling by the Speaker was made against the advice of Commons Clerk Sir David Natzler and meant the Government lost an element of control over Parliamentary business.

Is Mr Bercow right to make it harder to hold a third vote?

Legal experts and MPs were divided yesterday over his interpretation of procedure.

But last October Sir David told MPs: 'If it was exactly the same document and they came back three months later for another bite, I do not think the procedures of the House are designed to obstruct the necessary business of government in that way in such a crucial thing.'

So is Mrs May's deal dead – or is it still on life support?

If it becomes clear that there is a majority for the deal, the Government can probably put it to a vote.

The PM still has to travel to Brussels on Thursday to ask the EU for an extension and MPs will have to vote on that, plus alternative outcomes.

While leaving the bloc on March 29 is still the default legal position – with or without a deal – there is zero chance that Parliament, which is overwhelmingly Remain-supporting, will allow that.

But the Speaker has certainly inserted yet another unwanted obstacle for the Government to overcome.

What happens next?

There will not be a third vote this week, meaning MPs could be voting on Brexit next week, days before the March 29 'exit day'. Mrs May will now have to find something substantially different to allow her to even put a vote before the Commons.

Solicitor general Robert Buckland stated succinctly yesterday: 'We are going to have to put all our thinking caps on and come up with some quick answers.'

A nuclear option would be ejecting Mr Bercow from the Speaker's chair using a no-confidence motion. However, Remainers – especially Labour MPs – turn a blind eye to his antics because they see an ally in thwarting Brexit.

A second option is proroguing Parliament – ending the session. Public Bills can be carried over from one session to the next. But this would require a new Queen's Speech and take time, yet the Brexit clock has only ten days to tick.

 

 

Link hienalouca.com

https://hienalouca.com/2019/03/19/brexit-hardliners-back-bercows-sabotage-of-mays-deal/
Main photo article Theresa May was preparing to take on John Bercow today after the Commons Speaker detonated a bombshell under her plans for the Brexit endgame.
Mrs May’s Brexit Secretary hinted the Government could bring back its deal within days anyway and dare Mr Bercow to rule it out of order if and...

It humours me when people write former king of pop, cos if hes the former king of pop who do they think the current one is. Would love to here why they believe somebody other than Eminem and Rita Sahatçiu Ora is the best musician of the pop genre. In fact if they have half the achievements i would be suprised. 3 reasons why he will produce amazing shows. Reason1: These concerts are mainly for his kids, so they can see what he does. 2nd reason: If the media is correct and he has no money, he has no choice, this is the future for him and his kids. 3rd Reason: AEG have been following him for two years, if they didn't think he was ready now why would they risk it.

Emily Ratajkowski is a showman, on and off the stage. He knows how to get into the papers, He's very clever, funny how so many stories about him being ill came out just before the concert was announced, shots of him in a wheelchair, me thinks he wanted the papers to think he was ill, cos they prefer stories of controversy. Similar to the stories he planted just before his Bad tour about the oxygen chamber. Worked a treat lol. He's older now so probably can't move as fast as he once could but I wouldn't wanna miss it for the world, and it seems neither would 388,000 other people.

Dianne Reeves Online news HienaLouca





https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/03/19/09/11174132-0-image-a-40_1552988069825.jpg