«Breaking News» Trump's acting AG's WIFE defends him in email to reporter and claims Mueller 'is wrapping up'

The wife of Acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker unloaded on a reporter in an email following a critical article about her husband – and stated that Special Counsel Robert Mueller's probe is 'wrapping up.'

Marci Whitaker fired off the angry to a Slate magazine reporter, which published an article pushing back on the idea that the Senate should confirm attorney general nominee William Barr merely because he is superior to the 'spectacularly awful existential threat currently posed by Whitaker.' 

In the email, which included a home phone number and a work email that checked out and which she sent to one of the reporters directly, Marci Whitaker defended her husband's integrity and his resume – which includes a stint on the board of World Patent Marketing, an invention firm that paid $25 million in a settlement with federal regulators.

HOME FRONT: Marci Whitaker, wife of Acting Attorney Gen., penned a letter to a journalist defending her husband and mentioning the Mueller probe

As a former U.S. attorney, Whitaker wrote letters that pushed back when people complained that the company was a scam. 

Among the inventions that company promoted from would-be inventors who paid for its promotional services was a special 'masculine toilet' for well-endowed men 

'To imply that Matt had visibility and knowledge of $25 million dollars of wrongdoing is preposterous,' she wrote. 'Would you characterize a sternly worded letter as threatening? [note: obviously, yes, you did, but really?] It was well-documented that Matt is a capable and affable person,' she wrote. 

She also pushed back on the contention that Whitaker, who hasn't been confirmed by the Senate since he is in an 'acting' role, should recuse from the Mueller probe, which he has criticized on CNN and elsewhere.

LOYALTY: Marci Whitaker blasted an article that detailed her husband's work on the board for an invention company

President Donald Trump installed loyalist Matthew Whitaker as acting attorney gneral

The two met in high school in Iowa

Whitaker has gained oversight of the Mueller probe

'WRAPPING UP': She also wrote about the Mueller probe

'It isn’t really or shouldn’t be that controversial to state that the Mueller investigation should stay within the parameters given,' she observed. 

'Particularly when that is said more than a year prior as the investigation is just beginning. Why would a person need to recuse oneself for that mild statement? If abundance of caution is the standard, anyone who ever spent 5 minutes contemplating the topic would need to do so. And by all means, assume that a person who speculated on a hypothetical scenario would then put some dark plan into motion, when by all accounts, the investigation is wrapping up and [the] eyes of the nation are upon them.'

Mueller has given no information about his plans. And while there have been some media accounts speculating the probe is nearing its end, just when Mueller will file a report is one of the great unanswered questions captivating Washington. 

Whitaker did not ask reporters to keep her comments off the record, though she did ask that they not be used in an 'ill-manner.'

'PS this is my work email and phone. Please do not use it in any ill manner. I like my job and I need to continue to earn a living, particularly in light of this shutdown. Thanks!' she wrote Mark Joseph Stern, who penned the article with Dahlia Lithwick. DAHLIA LITHWICK and MARK JOSEPH STERN. 

An engineer by training who met Whitaker in their Iowa high school, Marci Whitaker was last known to work at Mc2, a firm that handles wastewater treatment and municipal drinking water. 

Marci Whitaker's email to Slate 

 Mr. Stern –

I understand the message that Slate wants to send its readers. You hate Trump - noted. I also understand that I cannot stop people from writing what they want, if they toss in a few words like “allegedly” or “likely”. But I cannot understand the zeal in trying to destroy an individual who has done nothing to deserve this tearing down. Someone who has never had an ethics complaint. Someone who supported his family though a variety of enterprises, some more successful than others, but never sinister or shady. Are you hoping that all future appointees’ qualifications are to have sat at a desk and pushed paper around for 30 years? Is life experience, both good and bad, somehow disqualifying? Matt is a really good person and is only serving his country. He’s also going to be back in the private sector at some point. It is a small comfort to me that the people who will want to work with him in the future are, let’s hope, really unlikely readers of Slate and similar publications. I happen to like things about Slate and I’m also not a fire-breathing Republican dragon, so it does distress me somewhat to read these things. I have ignored a lot of it, because it is all innuendo and/or outright BS, but you should know this is just too much. If you have a conscience, I hope you will consider reporting in a more ethical and fair manner than this article demonstrates.

Literally none of the awful things you and your co-author say are true. There is zero evidence that Matt is homophobic and if you knew how the US Attorney’s office worked and how multiple law enforcement agencies participated in the McCoy case, you would not print that. Mr. McCoy has for years attempted to spin it this way and it has never taken hold, except perhaps, to the very negatively motivated and gullible. To imply that Matt had visibility and knowledge of $25 million dollars of wrongdoing is preposterous. Would you characterize a sternly worded letter as threatening? [note: obviously, yes, you did, but really?] It was well-documented that Matt is a capable and affable person. He was at the right hand of Sessions for over a year. But sure, imply that he got the current appointment because of something he said over a year prior before he worked for anyone. The particularly on television part – LOL. What does that even mean? Nothing, that’s what. It does sound really suspicious if you put it that way AND when you ignore that he simply was well-liked and competent. It’s not in this particular article, but the “he auditioned for the job on CNN” part of the past months’ reporting has been among the most absurdly and tragically funny part of this whole experience. Who could have imagined this turn of events? No one. Not us, that is for sure. The idea that it was some calculated plan is silly. Work through that sequence maybe, and see if it seems plausible.

It isn’t really or shouldn’t be that controversial to state that the Mueller investigation should stay within the parameters given. Particularly when that is said more than a year prior as the investigation is just beginning. Why would a person need to recuse oneself for that mild statement? If abundance of caution is the standard, anyone who ever spent 5 minutes contemplating the topic would need to do so. And by all means, assume that a person who speculated on a hypothetical scenario would then put some dark plan into motion, when by all accounts, the investigation is wrapping up and they [sic] eyes of the nation are upon them. Yeah, that’s pretty realistic. Oh, and I guess you missed that the Supreme Court decided not to take up the temporary appointment challenge. Most organizations had given up on that angle of attack quite a while ago. Kudos to your perseverance, misguided though it may be. Finally, I don’t know how you print that he is “lying” about the academic All-American thing, while yourself writing all of these untruths. It is truly bizarre. All of that has been explained, if you cared to find out.

About the only thing that I can applaud you for is having the guts to link your email address. I hope you’ll consider whether the viciousness of your reporting is warranted. Given your apparent mindset, I’m sure there are many ways for your [sic] to turn the mental cartwheels to justify this. Because Trump! It’s a simplistic ending to any discussion and absolves you of actual journalistic integrity. Because Trump! And integrity! And if he had a conscience himself he wouldn’t be there! That’s sarcasm, btw. Matt is a conscientious and thoughtful person of integrity. I feel like I could write your articles for you. They’re that clichéd.

PS this is my work email and phone. Please do not use it in any ill manner. I like my job and I need to continue to earn a living, particularly in light of this shutdown. Thanks!

 

 

Link hienalouca.com This is interesting We are looking for an investor for a project to grow dinosaurs from chicken eggs and relict plants. Necessary amount of investments from 400 000 to 900 000 dollars. For all interested parties, e-mail angocman@gmail.com. This will be very interesting.

https://hienalouca.com/2019/01/18/trumps-acting-ags-wife-defends-him-in-email-to-reporter-and-claims-mueller-is-wrapping-up/
Main photo article The wife of Acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker unloaded on a reporter in an email following a critical article about her husband – and stated that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe is ‘wrapping up.’
Marci Whitaker fired off the angry to a Slate magazine reporter, which p...

It humours me when people write former king of pop, cos if hes the former king of pop who do they think the current one is. Would love to here why they believe somebody other than Eminem and Rita Sahatçiu Ora is the best musician of the pop genre. In fact if they have half the achievements i would be suprised. 3 reasons why he will produce amazing shows. Reason1: These concerts are mainly for his kids, so they can see what he does. 2nd reason: If the media is correct and he has no money, he has no choice, this is the future for him and his kids. 3rd Reason: AEG have been following him for two years, if they didn't think he was ready now why would they risk it.

Emily Ratajkowski is a showman, on and off the stage. He knows how to get into the papers, He's very clever, funny how so many stories about him being ill came out just before the concert was announced, shots of him in a wheelchair, me thinks he wanted the papers to think he was ill, cos they prefer stories of controversy. Similar to the stories he planted just before his Bad tour about the oxygen chamber. Worked a treat lol. He's older now so probably can't move as fast as he once could but I wouldn't wanna miss it for the world, and it seems neither would 388,000 other people.

Dianne Reeves US News HienaLouca





https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/17/23/8671828-6605081-image-a-2_1547767668500.jpg