The BBC has been accused of 'outrageously overspending' licence fee cash after it emerged that EastEnders' new set will cost £86.7million.
That is £27million over the original budget – and the project is expected to be nearly five years late.
Work to rebuild and extend Albert Square was due to be completed in August at a cost of £59.7million.
But a damning National Audit Office report published today finds that the BBC's poor planning and lack of expertise means it will cost 45 per cent more, and will not be completed until May 2023.
The NAO says the Corporation 'will not be able to deliver value for money' with the project, named E20 after the soap opera's fictional Walford postcode, which is being funded entirely from the £150.50-a-year TV licence fee.
Work to rebuild and extend Albert Square was due to be completed in August at a cost of £59.7million
The current EastEnders set at Elstree Studios in Hertfordshire was built in 1984 using steel frames, plywood and plaster brick panels. It was intended to last only two years.
The poor quality of construction means high-definition filming is not possible, while health and safety concerns have caused delays to filming.
The BBC is building a new 'front lot' – a brickwork replica of the current set – and a 'back lot' which will provide extra locations to 'better reflect modern East End London'. It has been reported that one of the new locations will be a mosque.
The front lot is now expected to cost £54.7million – 75 per cent more than planned – after it took 11 months for the BBC to negotiate with its contractor Wates.
Construction there has only just begun, while the back lot is still 'at an early design stage'.
Responsibility for the E20 project lies with Richard Dawkins, the £195,000-a-year chief operating officer of BBC Content.
The NAO report finds that early planning processes led to 'underestimation of aspects of complexity, cost and risks'.
The BBC is building a new 'front lot' – a brickwork replica of the current set – and a 'back lot' which will provide extra locations to 'better reflect modern East End London'
It says aspects of the design process were not assessed adequately, the BBC was over-optimistic and its staff 'had insufficient expertise in construction project management to identify critical issues'.
The Corporation tried to blame £9.2million of the cost increase on inflation and demand for construction services, but was 'unable to provide evidence' to support the figure, the NAO says.
Critical design stages were completed without appropriate approval and there was ineffective communication between the programme and production teams.
This led to the production team making more than 70 requests for design changes – eight months after the design was supposed to have been agreed.
These resulted in 16 changes and cost around £440,000, the NAO says.
The project did encounter problems with asbestos and obstructions that were 'to some extent unforeseen', but this was 'partly due to poor BBC site records, and limited surveying work', it adds.
Sir Amyas Morse, the head of the NAO, said: 'The BBC will not be able to deliver value for money on E20 in the way that it originally envisaged.
It is surprising that some of the reasons for this were built in from the beginning.
Despite recent project management improvements, E20 is late and over budget against its 2015 plans.
'Given the high-risk nature of E20, it will need close scrutiny until it is finished.'
EastEnders once regularly attracted 20million viewers per episode but now struggles to attract 7million.
The BBC tried to blame £9.2million of the cost increase on inflation and demand for construction services, but was 'unable to provide evidence' to support the figure, the National Audit Office said
Liberal Democrat MP Layla Moran said: 'The Queen Vic and Albert Square are dear to my heart, like lots of people, and there is no doubt in recent years the show has played a major role is raising many important societal issues.
However I can't imagine any of the straight-talking characters accepting this outrageous overspend of public money.'
Labour MP Meg Hillier, chairman of the public accounts committee, said: 'It is concerning that the BBC has been unable to keep to budget and time. It is critical, given the BBC's funding pressures, that every pound of licence fee payers' money is spent effectively.'
Labour MP Chris Evans, who sits on the committee, added: 'They're investing in a programme that is not as popular as it once was, and they really need to start thinking about investing in the long term and in projects that can be useful for other things other than just one programme.
'The BBC ought to realise that the licence fee is still unpopular. Many people are asking about value for money. At the end of the day, this isn't their money, this is licence fee payers' money.'
The BBC said: 'The set of EastEnders was built in 1984 and only intended for use for two years.
Over 30 years later, the show remains one of the BBC's flagship programmes and yet is filming from a set that is no longer fit for purpose.
'The new set is a large, complex project which has already delivered many other vital improvements at Elstree, but like any building work of this scale there have been challenges, including construction market issues beyond our control.
We've already made improvements and are keeping the project under close scrutiny.'
Link hienalouca.com
https://hienalouca.com/2018/12/13/bbc-accused-of-outrage-overspend-after-splurging-86million-of-taxpayer-cash-on-new-set/
Main photo article The BBC has been accused of ‘outrageously overspending’ licence fee cash after it emerged that EastEnders‘ new set will cost £86.7million.
That is £27million over the original budget – and the project is expected to be nearly five years late.
Work to rebuild and extend Albert Sq...
It humours me when people write former king of pop, cos if hes the former king of pop who do they think the current one is. Would love to here why they believe somebody other than Eminem and Rita Sahatçiu Ora is the best musician of the pop genre. In fact if they have half the achievements i would be suprised. 3 reasons why he will produce amazing shows. Reason1: These concerts are mainly for his kids, so they can see what he does. 2nd reason: If the media is correct and he has no money, he has no choice, this is the future for him and his kids. 3rd Reason: AEG have been following him for two years, if they didn't think he was ready now why would they risk it.
Emily Ratajkowski is a showman, on and off the stage. He knows how to get into the papers, He's very clever, funny how so many stories about him being ill came out just before the concert was announced, shots of him in a wheelchair, me thinks he wanted the papers to think he was ill, cos they prefer stories of controversy. Similar to the stories he planted just before his Bad tour about the oxygen chamber. Worked a treat lol. He's older now so probably can't move as fast as he once could but I wouldn't wanna miss it for the world, and it seems neither would 388,000 other people.
Dianne Reeves Online news HienaLouca
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2018/12/12/22/7354380-0-image-a-35_1544654002998.jpg
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий